When k = 2, this becomes the problem of packing of squares in a loop. What are the smallest rectangles you can find for various n? When k ≥ 3, we need the squares to form the vertices of a k-regular graph. Can you find small packings for k=3? Can you find any packings for k=4 or k=5? Can you see why packings are impossible for k ≥ 6?
Claudio Baiocchi noted that kn must be even to form a n-vertex k-regular graph.
Claudio Baiocchi also noted that when k=3, an n=4 solution
and an n=6 solution
exist when corner contacts are allowed.
If we relax the condition that the squares form a connected group, there are solutions for k=0 and k=1 as well. The k=0 solutions are related to the solutions with no connectivity constraints.
Below are the smallest known packings:
![]() n=2 area=6 | ![]() n=4 area=40 | ![]() n=6 area=108 | ![]() n=8 area=240 | ![]() n=10 area=435 | ![]() n=12 area=741 |
![]() n=14 area=1127 | ![]() n=16 area=1664 |
![]() n=3 area=15 | ![]() n=4 area=40 | ![]() n=5 area=63 | ![]() n=6 area=99 | ![]() n=7 area=156 | ![]() n=8 area=224 (Claudio Baiocchi) | ![]() n=9 area=315 |
![]() n=10 area=425 | ![]() n=11 area=546 | ![]() n=12 area=704 |
![]() n=13 area=896 | ![]() n=14 area=1092 |
![]() n=15 area=1325 | ![]() n=16 area=1612 |
![]() n=17 area=1904 | ![]() n=18 area=2236 |
Claudio Baiocchi found these packings for k=2, which are superior if connectedness is relaxed. He conjectures there are no such packings for k≥3.
![]() (Claudio Baiocchi) | ![]() (Claudio Baiocchi) |
![]() (Claudio Baiocchi) |
![]() n=8 area=221 | ![]() n=10 area=425 | ![]() n=12 area=693 |
![]() n=12 area=899 (Andrew Bayly) | ![]() n=14 area=1344 | ![]() n=15 area=1496 (Andrew Bayly) |
![]() n=16 area=2009 | ![]() n=17 area=2405 |
![]() n=18 area=2627 | ![]() n=24 area=6125 (Andrew Bayly) |
If you can extend any of these results, please e-mail me. Click here to go back to Math Magic. Last updated 12/23/07.