Russia
Religion News Current News Items
Difficulties in training religion teachers
TEACHERS NOT READY TO TEACH FOUNDATIONS OF RELIGIOUS CULTURES IN SCHOOLS
Although only month and half remains before start of the experiment.
by Ekaterina Rozhaeva
Komsomolskaia Pravda, 12 February 2010
A Komsomolskaia Pravda correspondent investigated how preparations for
introducing the most controversial school subject, "Foundations of
Religious Cultures and Secular Ethics," are going.
Very soon now, 1 April, in schools of 19 regions of Russia an
experiment will begin. The new subject will begin to be taught to
fourth graders. The course consists of six modules: Orthodox,
Islamic, Buddhist, and Jewish Cultures, History of World Religions, and
Foundations of Secular Ethics. The pupil can choose for himself whose
"foundations" are nearer to him. Children in the class will be divided
into groups and each will study the module that he desires. At least
this is the theory of the experiment. One thing for believers; another
for atheists. And neither is offended. But how does one fulfill the
theory in practice?
For this, training tutors have come from the experimental regions to
Moscow, to the Academy for Professional Development of Education
Workers. These are teachers who, in their turn, will return home and
are supposed to relay their knowledge to teachers who will have to
explain the "foundations" to pupils.
April Fools Joke
One does not push one's way in the wide corridors of the
academy. In the smoking room under the stairway are
teachers from Kostroma, Tver, and Vologda provinces.
"My head is mush," a teacher of "Foundations of Orthodox Culture" [OPK]
from Cherepovets says nervously. "How do I write an essay on my
attitude toward introducing the 'foundations' course if I do not
understand why and for whom it is needed?"
Colleagues from other regions nod in agreement.
"My director said right away: 'This is goofy!" a teacher from Tver
joined in. "For a single subject it is necessary to rearrange the
entire school schedule, devote additional hours, divide the children
into groups, and find separate classrooms for everybody. In fact,
nothing will come of it. They will have a talk with the parents and a
single subjectÑFoundations of Orthodox CultureÑwill be left.
"And they say the textbook for the subject is excellent" I interject
into the conversation.
"Have you seen it? Seen it? I have not," the Cherepovetsian warmed up.
"It's a pig in a poke. A bunch of methods, resources, techniques, but
what are you going to apply them to? This experiment is a kind of April
Fools joke."
Difficulties of understanding
The training program is exhaustingÑnine hours a day. The course takes
eight days, 72 classroom hours in all. Special resources and working
notebooks with assignments for all 34 lessons have been developed, of
which 29 deal with Orthodox culture. I took a look at a notebook and I
understood: outsiders who have never been interested in the
history of religions will have a hard time understanding the material
and doing the assignments.
For example: It is necessary to design a plan for the lesson "Sacred
Constructions" (the "Foundations of World Religions" module).
"What are sacred constructions and whom are they intended for?
What is the basis for Christian church buildings?
What are icons?
Why do the Jews not consider a synagogue a temple? What are the rules
for arranging a synagogue?
What distinguishes Orthodox and Catholic church buildings?"
The people frown and shrug their shoulders.
"People in the provinces do not understanding the tasks facing us. They
think that these are ordinary courses of professional development and
they sent teachers from the lower classes, social studies, and OPK,"
says the manager of the project, Olga Krutova. "But the goal is
differentÑto explain to local teachers, people with experience in
working with adult students, how to properly teach school teachers how
to present the new subject to children. We cannot train all 25,000
teachers in Moscow who have to teach in the fourth quarter 'Foundations
of Religious Cultures and Secular Ethics!'"
So they summoned a thousand trainers from the regions. But 75 percent
of those who came to the capital for study do not have a grasp on
in-depth knowledge of even one religion; they even make spelling
mistakes. To say nothing of the clarity of the text.
"Many confuse the concepts of 'ethics' and 'etiquette,'" laments Olga
Eduardovna.
It is most difficult for teachers of OPK. They have already taught
their course for some time and they are not ready to get deeper into
the peculiarities of other religions. The majority are believing people
and for them Orthodoxy is the only possible religion. With such an
attitude, impartiality is very difficult.
"We have a secular, culturological course and not a religious one,"
Krutova continues. "The task is to acquaint the children with the
foundations of all religious cultures existing in Russia. We even have
some trainers who approach fanaticism. When Andrei Kuraev came to give
a lecture, many teachers threw kisses to him and asked for his
blessing. They did not even know that he is not a priest but an
archdeacon!"
There is also another problem with the future tutorsÑcomputer
illiteracy. The seminars presupposed mastery of technology at an
elementary level, not advanced; teachers were supposed to know how to
use a word processor and find information on the Internet. The
lecturers confronted crude expressionsÑcomputers are unclean.
"Heretical textbook"
The authors of the courseÑscholars, religious studies expertsÑgave
lectures to the trainers. The author of the "Foundations of Orthodox
Culture" module, Archdeacon Andrei Kuraev, tried to direct his faith
sisters onto the proper path. He frankly called his own textbook
"heretical," since many fundamental Orthodox concepts are not explained
in the book.
"Your lessons should be presentations of Orthodoxy and not propaganda,"
Andrei Viacheslavovich urged. "You should love your Orthodoxy, but not
recruit for it. In every lesson you should provoke discussion and
debate, but without personal attacks. Suppress your personal
preferences. Any time, you can use examples the children understand.
Let's say you are studying the Lord's Prayer; remember that traffic
regulations and even emergency telephones also require knowing the
Lord's Prayer."
A co-author of the "Foundations of Jewish Culture" module, kandidat of
historical sciences, Mikhail Chlenov, tried to explain his subject with
no less clarity. At first he told an anecdote about an Orthodox
believer, Jew, and Muslim, for whom "There is one God; the providers
are diverse." And then he answered a trick question from a teacher from
Chechnya. Why is it necessary to circumcise that organ in order to
become a Jew, when it is simpler to cut off half an ear and you are
chosen.
"The point here is not chosenness," Mikhail Anatolievich responded with
knowledge of the case. "There is a commandment. It commanded
circumcision as a symbol of life, fertility, and death."
"In fact the Muslims have it also," the teacher chuckled.
A child's soul is clay; I want to mold it
At the conclusion of the course the future tutors take an
examinationÑprepare a lesson on the chosen topic and an essay. Nine
varieties are suggested. For example: "Your attitude toward
introducing the course 'Foundations of Religious Cultures and Secular
Ethics' in the schools;" "Native religious cultural tradition as the
spiritual foundation of a multinational people;" "Good and evil in the
light of the ideology of the 'foundations' course." It is possible also
to propose one's own topic.
"The essay is the most important part of the examination," Olga Krutova
says. "From it we can see what kind of person we are dealing with. The
trainer should not imagine himself as a teacher or an enlightener or a
peacemaker. He must understand the task and be prepared to teach
others. But by no means is everybody capable of this. There were essays
where the pedagogues wrote that the soul of a child is clay and it is
necessary for them to mold it. We cut off such people.
Ordinarily, of 200 students, 20 go home without a trainer's certificate.
P.S. By 1 March, the academy promises that all trainers will have
finished study. Then they have a month to deliver their knowledge to
the teachers.
Statistics
In Vologda province, 10,000 pupils will study "Foundations of Religious
Cultures." The teachers have already surveyed the pupils. Here is what
came out:
"Foundations of Secular Ethics" was chosen by 58% of fourth graders;
"Foundations of Orthodox Culture," 24%;
A total of eight pupils subscribed to "Foundations of Islam;" not one
chose "Foundations of Buddhism" or "Foundations of Judaism."
Officially
Approval of the new subject will occur in Kalmykia,
Karachaevo-Cherkesia, Udmurtia, Chechnya, Chuvashia, Kamchatka,
Krasnoyarsk, and Stavropol territories, Vologda, Kaliningrad, Kostroma,
Kurgan, Novosibirsk, Penza, Sverdlovsk, Tambov, Tver, and Tomsk
provinces, and in the Jewish Autonomous province.
It is planned to conduct a sociological investigation on the results of
the experiment and to prepare a report for the government of Russia.
"Now all the textual resources for the new subject are being printed
and by the beginning of the experiment there will be sufficient for all
19 regions," the head of the Information Department of the Ministry of
Education and Science, Alexander Kachanov, told us. "All teachers also
will have undergone retraining in that time. I assure you, the
experiment will come out successfully; we shouldn't surrender to a
pessimistic mood."
(tr. by PDS, posted 16 February 2010)
Russian original posted on
Interfax
site, 12 February 2010
Ministry of Justice not backing off
anti-evangelism law
MISSIONARIES' RIGHT TO DRAW CHILDREN INTO RELIGIOUS ACTIVITY SOON TO BE
RESTRICTED
Interfax,
15 February 2010
Evangelistic activity directed to Russians of minor age will be
restricted in the very near future, the Ministry of Justice of the
Russian federation reported.
"A draft of a federal law 'On introducing changes to federal law "On
freedom of conscience and religious associations" and the Russian
federation Code of administrative violations of law' has been worked
out and prepared for delivery to the government of the Russian
federation," a press release of the ministry that was distributed
Monday to the Summary College of the Ministry of Justice said.
The draft law aims "for a legislative definition of the concept of
evangelistic activity and also for strengthening the restrictions on
evangelistic activity directed to minors conducted by religious
associations."
In addition, the draft provides for restrictions on evangelistic
activity accompanied by offers of material, social, or other benefits
for the purpose of drawing citizens into religious associations and on
the sites of objects of religious significance belonging to another
religious association. (tr. by PDS, posted 15 February 2010)
Russia
Religion News Current News Items
Setback for anti-evangelism law?
JURIDICAL PURGE.
Ministry of Justice sacks people who conducted incompetent
anti-evangelism policy against non-Orthodox
by Roman Lunkin
Portal-credo.ru, 10 February 2010
The uproar evoked by a series of initiatives of the Ministry of Justice
of RF in the religious sphere roiled society and roused up against the
ministry many believers and defenders of freedom of conscience in
Russia and abroad. Since Alexander Konovalov's assumption of the post
of minister in 2008, radical sect-fighters have been appointed the
chief experts on religion in the Ministry of Justice, intimidating
investigations of religious associations have begun, and in October
2009 the Ministry of Justice proposed a draft law harshly restricting
evangelistic activity in Russia. All of this has sharply undermined the
confidence of believers in the authorities in general, and they have
begun talking about the onset of new persecution.
Meanwhile, when the situation had already flared up to the limit, at
the beginning of 2010 it became known that key figures responsible for
the incompetent policy with respect to believers had been dismissed
from the Ministry of Justice. These were assistant of the minister,
Aleksei Velichko, and the head of the Department on Noncommercial
Organizations, which includes work with religious associations, Sergei
Milushkin. The press service of the Ministry of Justice confirmed
that this is indeed so; the odious figures do not work in the Ministry
of Justice any longer.
Instead of Velichko, on 14 January 2010 by order of Russian President
D. Medvedev, Alexander Fedorov was named first deputy of the minister
of justice; previously he had served as deputy to the head of the
Federal Service for Drug Control of Russia.
From the moment of appointment (June 2008) Velichko was authorized from
the very beginning to oversee noncommercial organizations, since they
were moved out of the purview of the Federal Registration Service to be
immediately under the Ministry of Justice. Previously he worked as
deputy to the director of the administration of state registration of
rights to immoveable property of the Federal Registration Service. And
since 2006 he was assistant to Alexander Konovalov, who then was the
presidential envoy for the Volga federal district. Aleksei Velichko
naturally complemented his director, Alexander Konovalov, since
Velichko is the author of books about the symphony of authorities in
Byzantium and Russia. Naturally, almost immediately after the
"Byzantine party" arrived at the ministry, it began to construct the
ideal of symphony of church and secular authorities in the way that it
understands it.
Aleksei Velichko began conducting a policy of pressure upon and
intimidation of religious associations, especially non-Orthodox ones.
In October 2008 the Ministry of Justice of RF first frightened
believers when it published a list of 50 religious associations that
were candidates for liquidation. Among them were Muslim, Jewish,
Buddhist, protestant, and alternative Orthodox associations. Many of
the associations named by the Ministry of Justice had submitted
accounts routinely and thus the clumsy step of the ministry was seen by
all as some kind of signal.
It was Aleksei Velichko who was the patron of the sect-fighters led by
Dvorkin, who with his support (and the support of the minister) were
appointed in the spring of 2009 to the Council for Conducting State
Religious Studies Expert Analysis of the Ministry of Justice. And
Alexander Dvorkin, who is well known for his scurrilous articles and
pronouncements against all non-Orthodox groups as "sectarians," became
the chairman of this council. Against the sect-fighters and in defense
of freedom of conscience there has been conducted an action labeled "No
to Inquisitors!," which has collected 13,000 signatures of ordinary
believers, church leaders, and secular scholars. Velichko himself, in
an interview with "Rossiiskaia gazeta," had to justify Dvorkin by
saying that "inquisitorial" policies have not been conducted in the
ministry. However the sect-fighters have so far discredited the
Ministry of Justice and the Russian state. Exploiting their status as
members of the council within the Ministry of Justice, they have made
statements in the press and turned loose law enforcement agencies upon
separate churches in the regions (especially active in this are Dvorkin
and a member of Dvorkin's council, the sect-fighter Kuzmin from
Saratov). Attempts to open a case against Kuzmin for incitement
of interreligious strife have so far been unsuccessful. The protestant
churches of Saratov have turned to another council created within the
Ministry of Justice as an alternative to the infamous sect-fighting
council, the Council for Conducting Expert Analysis of Religious
Literature with Regard to the Subject of Extremism. The churches are
demanding the conduct of an expert analysis of Kuzmin's publications to
see whether they contain signs of incitement of interreligious
hostility. Alarmed believers have filed suits against sect-fighters who
are disciples of Dvorkin in many regions of Russia. Councils for
Religious Studies Expert Analysis in the departments of justice in the
provinces have begun to be headed either by overt sect-fighters or
directly by Orthodox clergy (as in Rostov province). The impression has
been created that the strained religious situation has been created
under the patronage of the departments of justice.
Under the leadership of Velichko there also has continued in the
Ministry of Justice work on the draft law for control of evangelistic
activity. Dvorkin and another Orthodox activist and Islamic scholar
Roman Silantiev, a member of Dvorkin's council, also participated in
the development of the draft. The draft, which was posted on the web
site of the Ministry of Justice on 12 October 2009, evoked a squall of
letters and appeals from churches sent to President Medvedev with the
demand not to permit the country to revert to the repressions of soviet
times with respect to all those who evangelize. The draft law obliges
each believer who evangelizes somewhere to have in his possession a
document from a registered religious association, and members of a
religious group who act without notification of the authorities are
forbidden to evangelize. As a result, the draft was removed from the
Ministry of Justice's site. The promotion of the draft law in round
table sessions in the State Duma and at other events was undertaken by
the head of the Department on Noncommercial Organizations, Milushkin,
who insisted on its necessity. . . .
[The article contains numerous details of a scandal over property that
involves Velichko, but has nothing to do with religion or the Ministry
of JusticeÑed.]
There is no doubt that one should not entertain any illusions that
after the departure of the discredited figure who conducted the
incompetent policy the Ministry of Justice will abandon the attempt to
construct a "symphony of authorities"Ñthe Russian Orthodox church and
the state. Russian Minister of Justice Alexander Konovalov, a deeply
Orthodox person with theological education, is himself an advocate of
the original neo-Byzantinism. However, the scandalous dismissals and
the discrediting in the eyes of believers of the capacity of the
government and departments of justice to protect the principles of
freedom of conscience may force higher bureaucrats to be more
conscientious and not be so arrogant in a country of flourishing
religious diversity such as Russia. Statements, letters, protests, and
actions against the inquisitors slowly but surely are having their
effect. (tr. by PDS, posted 12 February 2010)
Russian original posted on site of
Slavic Legal Center,
10 February 2010
Russia
Religion News Current News Items
Jehovah's Witnesses may lose Moscow building
HISTORIC MOSCOW BUILDING TO BE TAKEN FROM JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES AND GIVEN
TO WAR VETERANS
Portal-credo.ru,
3 February 2010
The prefecture of the northern district of Moscow is working out the
juridical aspect of the possibility of a transfer to veterans of war of
a historic building in the Mikhalkovo estate, the press service of the
prefecture reported to Interfax.
A conference was held 3 February devoted to questions of enforcing the
legislation in the area of preserving the cultural and historic
heritage on the territory of the Sokol settlement and Mikhalkovo
estate.
According to data of the prefecture, the building located at the
address Mikhalovskaia street, section 36, structure 1 was illegally
privatized by the Peter Alekseev Textile Factory of Moscow and donated
to the Administrative Center of Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia.
Meanwhile, it unexpectedly transpired that the building is located on
the territory of an historic estate and has historic value. In 1942 and
the beginning of 1943, after the battle on the Volga, the 83rd Guard
Mortar Regiment was created and organized here, which was awarded the
Order of the Red Banner and Order of Bogdan Khmelnitsky (2nd degree)
for heroism. Also after the battle for Stalingrad, the famous 18th
Guard Mortar Regiment was located here, and in 1942 the 47th Guard
Mortar Regiment was created here.
Complaints from veterans have frequently arrived at the prefecture
because at the present time the Jehovah's Witnesses organization is
situated in the historic building on Mikhalkovskaia street.
At the present time, the judicial questions on the problem of
"releasing" and transferring the building to veterans of the Great
Patriotic War by 9 May 2010 are being worked out. (tr. by PDS, posted 4
February 2010)
Russia
Religion News Current News Items
Pentecostal activity worries Orthodox
PERM DIOCESE OF RPTsMP RECEIVES DIRECTIVE FROM PATRIARCH KIRILL TO
INCREASE EVANGELISTIC ATTENTION TO PENTECOSTALS' ACTIVITY
Portal-credo.ru,
3 February 2010
Ruling Bishop of Perm Irinarkh reported this, citing a resolution of
the primate of the Russian Orthodox church of the Moscow patriarchate
(RPTsMP) with respect to the diocesan annual report, a correspondent of
Portal-credo.ru reports.
In a general interview with the "Zvezda" newspaper of Perm, Bishop
Irinarkh presented the following formulation of the patriarchal
resolution: "In evangelistic work the Perm diocese must devote
special attention to the growth in the region of the non-Christian
religious factor and the development of the activity of Pentecostals."
According to Bishop Irinarkh: "His holiness the patriarch noted
that Perm has been turned into the center of European
neo-Pentecostalism." As the Perm bishop put it, Pentecostals "ensnare
in their nets the Orthodox population of Perm through their
proselytism."
The head of the Perm diocese thinks that the Lenin House of Culture,
which has been given "to the Pentecostals for next to nothing" in
Motovilikha, could be big enough to house the art gallery, which for
more than 70 years has been located in the building of the historic
Transfiguration cathedral church. Motovilikha is now an industrial
region of Perm, while before the 1920s it developed as an independent
Urals factory city. Because of the geographical peculiarities,
Motovilikha is separated from old Perm by a large ravine and the region
has maintained the identity of a separate settlement.
"The area there is 10,000 square meters and the gallery occupies 7,000
square meters, so why have the leaders of culture kept silent," the
hierarch noted.
The promised construction of an art gallery has not begun, and in
connection with this Bishop Irinarkh noted: "They have spent so
many millions on drawing up the plans for the new building for the
gallery and, despite this, the governor was forced to 'cut' it."
Speaking of this, the head of the diocese quoted the opinion of
Patriarch Kirill that he expressed to him during their last meeting
regarding the necessity of seeking support from the Russian
presidential administration if the problem is not resolved locally.
In addition, the hierarch has been told that in Perm, apparently, they
are just waiting for the decisive statement regarding the transfer of
the art collection to another place, in order after that "to pounce on
the Orthodox bishop another timeÑthat's what the bishop does in Perm
territory."
In response to possible reproaches of his imagined critics, Bishop
Irinarkh declared: "Well, I do my own thing! I have to answer for
Orthodoxy and the Orthodox spirituality in Perm territory. But without
property, without premises, I will not be able to do anything. I am not
an angel. I am not able to prayer together with the Perm flock in the
clouds. And I only ask for what is necessary for the life of believing
citizens, for their spiritual nourishment by the clergy of the Russian
Orthodox church in Perm territory." (tr. by PDS, posted 3 February 2010)
Russia
Religion News Current News Items