Under Florida law, the circuit courts and the district courts of appeal engage in a limited judicial review of state agency decisions, particularly of local zoning boards, because the courts defer to an agency’s expertise. There is, however, substantial confusion surrounding the scope of the limited review of local zoning board decisions, which makes it difficult-for courts to determine if a state agency has abused its discretion, made erroneous findings of fact, or misapplied the law. Under the current system of certiorari review, a single judge in the circuit court may have too much discretion to review state agency decisions, while a district court of appeal may have too little discretion to determine if there is an error, thus potentially depriving property owners of their rights or interfering with the exercise of legitimate state police power. The Authors urge that certiorari review does not give either property owners or the government, both of which have significant rights at stake, an appeal that would satisfy their constitutional right to such review. The Authors further suggest that society should revisit the issue of judicial review of state agency decisions to afford the parties their constitutional right to review.