The foreclosure process is in shambles thanks, in part, to the substitution of county clerks or other registrars with the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) and the transition from reliance on pooling and servicing agreements (PSAs) as evidence of title to reliance on post-foreclosure sale assignments. MERS sacrificed accuracy for efficiency, allowing the practice of robosigning to run rampant. As a result, many false documents were filed, often resulting in the transfer of bad title. In U.S. Bank National Ass’n v. Ibanez, the Massachusetts Supreme Court held that while post-foreclosure sale assignment documents did not act as evidence of clear title, the PSA did act as an element of proof of transfer. To prevent wrongful foreclosure, fraudulent activity, and rampant errors in the mortgage recording and foreclosure systems, this Article recommends that courts should follow in line with Ibanez and require an original or copy of a document executed at the time of the transfer transaction to prove clear title; courts and attorneys should not rely on assignment documents; sanctions should be brought against violators; and legislation should be passed that instructs the mortgage industry on how to secure good title and creates penalties for false or fraudulent documents.