Skip to content

Duo from India wins 24th Annual Stetson IEMCC in first all-virtual version of contest

Shilpa Prasad and Pranav Valiathan Pillai from National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS) in Kochi, India, won the 24th Annual IEMCC. They are pictured here with the competition judges and Stetson Dean Michèle Alexandre.
Shilpa Prasad and Pranav Valiathan Pillai from National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS) in Kochi, India, won the 24th Annual Stetson IEMCC. They are pictured here with the competition judges and Stetson Dean Michèle Alexandre.

The 24th Annual Stetson International Environmental Moot Court Competition (IEMCC) looked a little different this year because of the coronavirus pandemic, but 17 teams from 10 jurisdictions participated virtually over the course of three days, April 2-4, 2020.

Shilpa Prasad and Pranav Valiathan Pillai from National University of Advanced Legal Studies (NUALS) in Kochi, India, emerged as champions. Rayana Mukherjee and Aaditya Shankar Dixit from National Law Institute University in Bhopal, India, were runners-up.

NUALS also received the award for the best memorial, and all of the teams that participated in the virtual rounds received the Spirit of Stetson Award. The full results are below.

The competition was held in conjunction with the International Wildlife Law Conference this year, and both events were moved online in light of travel restrictions and social distancing. The conference presentations can be viewed in their entirety on Stetson’s YouTube Channel, and clips from the IEMCC are available on its Facebook page.

Students logged on at all hours as they competed from around the globe.
Students logged on at all hours—even 3 a.m.—as they competed from around the globe.

It was a community-wide effort involving many people and departments from Stetson Law, including Media Services, Communications and the Web Team, Faculty Support, International Programs, the Advocacy Center, the Office of Professional Education, and the Business Office to make the virtual versions of the events a success, said Royal Gardner, director of the Institute for Biodiversity Law and Policy.

“The students were very much appreciative,” he said, and shared an excerpt of an email from one of the competing teams.

After having booked our flights and made plans to meet you all in Florida, we were extremely disappointed to find out that the rounds had been canceled due to the pandemic. We were rather hesitant to even take part in the virtual rounds.

But after having gone through this unique virtual experience, we are truly overwhelmed with the kind of resilience, support, and patience your organizing team displayed. We cannot even imagine how difficult it must have been for you to coordinate with the judges, teams, and volunteers and take such tireless efforts to conduct this moot so smoothly. We had a wonderful time and every single moment was perfect. Please thank all the volunteers on our behalf.

Once again, thank you for spearheading these efforts and giving us this chance. It truly means the world to us.

24th Annual Stetson International Environmental Moot Court Competition

International Finals – Virtual Rounds

April 2–4, 2020

Oralist Awards for the Preliminary Rounds: 

  • Fifth Place Oralist: Rayana Mukherjee, National Law Institute University, Bhopal – 2000
  • Fourth Place Oralist: Lin Shi Yuan, National Taiwan University – 2083
  • Third Place Oralist: Beatriz Anna S. Balbacal, University of the Philippines College of Law – 2039
  • Second Place Oralist: Shilpa Prasad, National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi – 2099
  • Best Oralist in the Preliminary Rounds: Urania Estrellita Amelia Remedios P. Lindo, University of the Philippines College of Law – 2039

Memorial Awards: 

  • Third Place Memorial: National Taiwan University – 2083
  • Runner-up Best Memorial: Ateneo de Manila University School of Law – 2040
  • Best Memorial: National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi – 2099

Semifinalists: 

  • George Washington University Law School – 2009
  • Law Society of Ireland – 2032

Final Round: 

  • Runner-up: National Law Institute University, Bhopal – 2000
  • International Finals Champion: National University of Advanced Legal Studies, Kochi – 2099
  • Best Oralist in the Final Round: Rayana Mukherjee, National Law Institute University, Bhopal – 2000

Spirit of Stetson Award:

  • All teams that participated in the virtual rounds of the competition

View photos from the competition

A gallery of photos from the virtual rounds of the competition is available on Zenfolio.

Stetson Law ranked best school for Trial Advocacy in the U.S. for the 22nd time in 26 years

Stetson Law is ranked number 1 in Trial Advocacy and number 3 in Legal Writing from U.S. News & World Report 2021.

For the 22nd time, Stetson University College of Law is ranked the No. 1 school for Trial Advocacy in the United States, according to U.S. News & World Report. Stetson is ranked No. 3 for Legal Writing.

“It is a remarkable accomplishment to be ranked number one in Trial Advocacy for the 22nd time,” said Stetson University President Wendy B. Libby, Ph.D. “This steadfast dedication to excellence underlines Stetson’s commitment to a rigorous education where innovative faculty are deeply invested in ensuring our law students become outstanding legal advocates in their communities.”

This year marks Stetson Law’s 120th anniversary, and since its inception, the college has required its students to enroll in a practice court advocacy course. In fact, it is believed to be the first academic course of its kind at a law school. Through the Center for Excellence in Advocacy, Stetson continues to take seriously that legacy of molding practice-ready lawyers every day.

dean michele alexandre
Dean Michèle Alexandre

“Stetson has remained among the top programs in the country for Trial Advocacy for more than a quarter of a century and in legal writing for more than a decade,” said Stetson Dean Michèle Alexandre. “We are incredibly proud of these accolades, as they reinforce that our mission – to transform students into advocates who are compassionate, ethical, powerful, persuasive and overall committed to excellence, not only in the legal profession, but in service to their communities – continues to thrive.”

Just as important as trial advocacy, legal writing is a bedrock skill for any practicing lawyer. Stetson’s legal research and writing curriculum provides students the tools to hone their ability to complete sophisticated legal analysis and to write clearly and persuasively. The faculty, through Stetson’s Institute for the Advancement of Legal Communication, pursue scholarship and leadership in legal writing.

Kirsten K. Davis
Dr. Kristen K. Davis

“Our mission has always been to lead the way in legal communication,” said Dr. Kirsten K. Davis, director of the Institute for the Advancement of Legal Communication. “That Stetson ranks among the top legal writing programs in the country is feedback that our program is forward-thinking and our curriculum robust. We are thrilled.”

More information about Stetson’s nationally distinguished specialty programs is available online https://www.stetson.edu/law/academics/advocacy/home/ and https://www.stetson.edu/law/academics/lrw/.

Stetson BLSA competition teams place in top 3 in national contests

The Stetson BLSA Trial Team and Dispute Resolution Team with their coaches.
The Stetson BLSA Trial Team and Dispute Resolution Team members with their coaches. From left: Whitany Lewis, Abigail Dean, Emeraude Lerebours, Professor James Sheehan, Coach Justin Scott, Noel Gonzalez, Jasmine Mattear, and Conklin Howard.

Stetson Law’s BLSA Trial Team and Dispute Resolution Team extended the long green line of Stetson success with second and third places, respectively, in competitions at the 52nd National Black Law Student Association (NBLSA) Convention in Cincinnati, Ohio, March 6-8, 2020.

The Trial Team placed second overall out of 17 teams in the Constance Baker Motley (CBM) Mock Trial Competition, missing the title by a single point. The Dispute Resolution placed third out of 12 teams in the Nelson Mandela International (NMI) Negotiation Competition. The NBLSA hosts three competitions during the convention, and Stetson was the only school to place in the top 3 in more than one contest.

BLSA Trial Team
Noel Gonzalez, Emeraude Lerebours, Coach and alumnus Justin Scott, Jasmine Mattear, and Conklin Howard placed second in the trial team competition.

The students had to overcome some distinct hurdles: All of the team members were competition rookies; though Stetson BLSA teams have attended the CBM Trial Competition in the past, they made never made it to Nationals; and this was the first time Stetson BLSA competed in the NMI Negotiation Competition.

Trial Team members were Noel Gonzalez, Emeraude Lerebours, Jasmine Mattear, and Conklin Howard. Dispute Resolution Team members were Abigail Dean and Whitany Lewis. Stetson Alumnus Justin Scott and Professor James Sheehan served as coaches.

“I am grateful for the opportunity to coach this talented group of advocates – it makes coaching easy! None of this would have been possible without the vision and dedication of BLSA President Forest Sutton and the unrelenting support and dedication of Professor Julia Metts and the Advocacy Center,” Scott said.

BLSA Dispute Resolution Team
Stetson BLSA Dispute Resolution team Whitany Lewis and Abigail Dean took third at nationals.

It was Sutton, a veteran of Stetson’s Trial and Dispute Resolution teams, who sought to revive a Stetson BLSA contingent of competition teams, said Julia Metts, director of trial programs. 

“I couldn’t have been more excited to help,” Metts said. “I knew we could do great things, but I had no idea that the team would make it to Nationals in their first competition. And then be a finalist at Nationals!”

“Great things are possible when we give students, who have the courage to dream, the support to accomplish those dreams,” she continued. “Forest and the BLSA board organized tryouts, found a coach, supported the team during practices, and helped make this moment possible.”

Sutton, for his part, was just as pleased with the teams’ results this year and believes future students can build on the momentum.

“I couldn’t be more proud of each competitor who dedicated so much time and effort into developing their advocacy skills, but also representing BLSA at a national competition,” Sutton said. “To have gone out and made Stetson’s name known in a brand new setting is simply remarkable. Additionally, the support BLSA received from other students, faculty members, and alumna Brielle Tucker makes me optimistic about the success BLSA can build upon in the coming years.”

New Tax Innovators Exchange brings national tax experts to Stetson Law

EDITOR’S NOTE: This event was postponed due to COVID-19 and rescheduled to Nov. 13, 2020. Read about the new event here.

GULFPORT, Fla. – The Tax Law Society at Stetson University College of Law will present the Stetson Tax Innovators Exchange (S.T.I.X.) on March 31, 2020, featuring IRS Deputy Director Sunita Lough and renowned tax attorney Marc Simonetti.

S.T.I.X. is a new and forward-thinking tax law collaboration event focused almost exclusively on tax practitioners – those working in the trenches every day.  The nation’s top tax attorneys will dive into bleeding edge approaches to the practice of tax law and lead group discussions where practitioners can share challenges they face…and have a room full of the greatest tax minds in the country grab a white board and work the problem out with them.

This interactive seminar will feature topics that run the gamut, but the overall goal is to ensure attendees leave armed with useful new techniques to advance not only their practice, but the field itself.

The first event in this innovative annual series will feature presentations by:

  • Sunita Lough, the new IRS Deputy Commissioner of Enforcement and Services –  A graduate of George Mason University Law School with an LLM in Taxation from Georgetown University School of Law, Lough has filled a variety of roles in her 25 years with the IRS.
  • Marc Simonetti, partner with Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP – Recognized by Chambers USA: Guide to Leading Business Lawyers in the area of tax, Simonetti is well known for his expertise in state and local taxation.

This event is sponsored by the Tax Section of The Florida Bar. Cost is $40 and includes two CLE credits and refreshments, followed by a networking opportunity with open bar.

Register online at https://cvent.me/9aOW57?RefId=TAX                                                   

For more information, contact Stetson Tax Law Society board member Eric Allen Kauk, at [email protected] or by phone at (813) 203-0208.

Florida panther’s dramatic tale subject of latest biodiversity series lecture

Watch the complete lecture online here or on Stetson Law’s YouTube channel.

By Taylor Allyn

On Feb. 27, the Stetson Law community welcomed writer Craig Pittman to speak as a part of the Foreman Biodiversity lecture series. Pittman is a native Floridian and an environmental reporter for the Tampa Bay Times. He has written five award-winning books– his most recent work is titled Cat Tale: The Wild, Weird Battle to Save the Florida Panther.

Pittman has covered the Florida panthers for years in his capacity as a reporter, and the more he learned, the more he became fascinated by the animals. He began his talk by describing what he believed to be a statue of a panther in the State Archives in Tallahassee. It was only later that he realized the statue was a real stuffed panther and what’s more, it had a name – Florida Panther 3. Its death was a tragedy and would be the catalyst for a radical conservation effort.

But before completing that tale, Pittman explained the earliest inhabitants of the state regarded these panthers as divine beings – cats of god. In the Seminole tribe, all medicine men are members of the panther clan. Early settlers in Florida called them lions and catamounts and were deeply scared of them. In the 1800s, sportsmen came to Florida just to shoot and kill panthers. They became so rare they were only ever seen in roadside zoos. By 1958, state officials banned panther hunting, but not before the damage had already been done.

Roadside zoos in Florida were some of the only places left to see a live panther after hunters and development drove them to the brink of extinction, Pittman explained.
Roadside zoos in Florida were some of the only places left to see a live panther after hunters and development drove them to the brink of extinction.

In the later part of the century, state officials focused on saving the panthers. The Florida panther was on the first endangered species list promulgated by the Endangered Species Act. Environmental activists rallied to oppose the construction of an airport in Big Cypress Swamp because it was one of the only place where panthers still lived. However, many believed the animals to be completely gone – hunted to extinction. A tracker from Texas was hired to see if he could find any surviving panthers in Florida. He found one scrawny female and signs of more, estimating there to be about 20 left.

After that, the state Game Commission designated a biologist to lead studies about the panthers, publicizing the search and raising awareness. In the 1980s, the state Education Commissioner wanted local schoolchildren to pick the official state animal, and the children overwhelmingly voted for the panther.

Pittman then explained where Florida Panther 3 fit into the story. It’s predecessor, Florida Panther 1, was the first panther to have a radio collar installed as part of an initiative to track their travels. Florida Panther 3 was fitted with a collar whose batteries began to malfunction. When the animal was recaptured to replace the batteries, a tranquilizer dart pierced its femoral artery, and the panther died. According to Pittman, this changed the public sentiment toward panthers – at least one person suggested, “just stop bothering them and let them go extinct.”

Tampa Bay Times reporter Craig Pittman explains how Nathaniel Reed was a Florida native and co-author of the Endangered Species Act.
Tampa Bay Times reporter Craig Pittman explains how Nathaniel Reed was a Florida native and co-author of the Endangered Species Act.

Instead, a veterinarian was assigned to tag along on some of these captures, and she began to notice oddities in the animals – genetic defects as a result of their small population. She noticed the panthers had tails kinked at a 90 degree angle, and later examinations uncovered reproductive issues and holes in their hearts.

After that, faced with the prospect of the extinction of the newly crowned state animal, state officials took more aggressive action. A captive breeding program was initiated and subsequently halted by a lawsuit filed by animal activists. The lawsuit was settled on the condition that only six kittens be captured – three male and three female. Unfortunately, all the kittens had the same genetic defects.

That’s when officials decided to try something drastic: to bring in another type of cougar to breed with the Florida panthers. That same hunter who located the remaining panther population was tasked with capturing and transporting eight female cougars from Texas to release in Florida. Meanwhile, the federal government was handing out permits to developers “the way they toss beads out at Gasparilla,” resulting in further destruction of panther habitats, Pittman said. The permits were later exposed by a whistleblower to be based on junk science.

The battle to preserve panther habitat, protect them from automobile deaths on Florida highways, and maintain continued population growth, is ongoing. Pittman wrapped up his talk by sharing a bit of positive news. Thanks to the breeding program, panther populations now are estimated to be 10 times their original number of 20. It’s not nearly enough to say the animals are recovered, and they still face threats, including from the proposed toll road that would cut right through their habitats. However, the animals remain extremely adaptable, and they are constantly surprising those who study them, he said.

Stetson Law’s Vis International Arbitration Moot team advances to competition in Vienna

Stetson Law’s Vis International Arbitration Moot team won the Richard DeWitt Memorial Vis Pre-Moot competition in Miami on Feb. 29, 2020. From left: Huda Awan, Audrey Gangloff, Melissa Micceri, Prof. Stephanie Vaughan (coach), Joe Cuffel, Devin Dudley, Pedro Aranguez Diaz, Clare McQueen (student coach) and Prof. Joseph Morrissey (coach).

Stetson University College of Law’s Vis International Arbitration Moot team won the Richard DeWitt Memorial Vis Pre-Moot on Saturday, Feb. 29, 2020, in Miami. The victory prepares the team to advance to the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot competition in Vienna in early April.  

Team members are Huda Awan, Melissa Micceri, Devin Dudley, Audrey Gangloff, Pedro Aranguez Diaz, and Joe Cuffel. This was the first competition for Awan, Diaz, Dudley, and Micceri, and the first dispute resolution competition for Gangloff, who is also a member of the Moot Court Board. Cuffel was the lone veteran on the team. 

Professor Joseph Morrissey, Professor Stephanie Vaughan, and student Clare McQueen coached the team. McQueen was part of last year’s team that advanced to the Elite 8 in Vienna. They said the competition was especially fierce this year, with international (Finnish Lapland University) and out-of-state (American University Washington College of Law and Tulane Law School) teams joining the usual Florida schools. 

The Florida Bar International Law Section hosts the Richard DeWitt Memorial Vis Pre-Moot for teams competing in the Willem C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot competition in Vienna and Hong Kong. The day-long event includes four rounds between the competing law schools with seasoned practitioners serving as arbitrators. The event gives students an opportunity to practice and sharpen their skills by presenting and defending their legal arguments and receiving feedback from some of the best practitioners in international law. 

Students must argue the jurisdictional, procedural and substantive issues raised by the case before a panel composed of practitioners, under the applicable international treaties and rules. The subject matter of the competition is typically a controversy that arises out of a dispute governed by the United Nation’ Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods.   

Town hall meeting lets students, staff weigh in on Campus Climate Survey

Dean Michèle Alexandre, far left, takes a question from Stetson Law student Kia Tolbert during the town hall meeting on the Campus Climate Survey.
Dean Michèle Alexandre, far left, takes a question from Stetson Law student Kia Tolbert during the town hall meeting on the Campus Climate Survey.

By Molly Kaelin

Dean Michèle Alexandre hosted a town hall meeting to discuss the Campus Climate Survey with students, faculty, and staff in the Great Hall on Feb. 18. The informal gathering gave participants a chance to express concerns and exchange ideas.

The Campus Climate Survey is currently open for students faculty and staff; the deadline for completion is March 6. The purpose is to gauge the institution’s progress on becoming a more diverse, equitable and inclusive community and identify new initiatives that could be implemented or any action areas that should be addressed.

Wonderful changes can come from our collective voice, and we need continued participation in the survey for this reason, Dean Alexandre said.

“This is something that can be meaningful, and you can tell your honest truth.”

The survey is confidential. Submitted surveys go directly to neutral third party provider, Pryor Education Insights, which will compile and analyze the data. Results will be available in the fall, and Dean Alexandre hopes to have representatives from the company on campus to explain the findings.

The last campus climate survey was conducted in 2016, and it led to such programs as the Food Pantry and Sexual Health Resource Area and the identification of gender-neutral bathrooms on campus, as well as the creation of a Diversity and Inclusion Committee and Staff Advisory Committee. That year, the response rate from the College of Law (including students, staff and faculty) was 34 percent. This year, Dean Alexandre said she hopes to have at least 50 percent participation.

Professor Lance Long said they hope to have robust student participation in the Campus Climate Survey.

Professor Lance Long, a member of the Diversity and Inclusion Committee, beseeched students to take the time to complete the survey.

“We really want more input from the students,” he said. “They’re why we exist.”

During the meeting, students expressed the need for more involvement in the community – specifically, the school’s need to reach out to local organizations such as the St. Petersburg Bar Association and other similar organizations. The emphasis was on going out in the legal community and not merely inviting people to speak or network on campus. More visibility will only lead to more opportunities for Stetson Law students and the College of Law overall, students said.

Other student concerns included greater support for students that commute and students with families, as well as easier access to member of the administration. Faculty and staff concerns centered on tension between different departments and staff changes. There was a request to have staff change information available in real time. With these needs voiced, the College of Law can now work to address them.

Dean Alexandre reiterated the best way to have your voice heard in a confidential manner is to fill out the survey before the March 6 deadline. Check your email for a link to the survey or pick up a paper copy in the Student Affairs office.

Photos by Law Student Emmanuel Bonilla.

Culverhouse Chair Devon Carbado hosts class on critical race judgements

Culverhouse Chair and UCLA Law Professor Devon Carbado lectures on critical race judgements in a special class for students on Saturday, Feb. 8, 2020.
Culverhouse Chair and UCLA Law Professor Devon Carbado lectures on critical race judgements in a special class for students on Saturday, Feb. 8, 2020.

By Brittany Given
Stetson Law 3L
Feb. 14, 2020

Devon Carbado, distinguished UCLA law professor and author, returned to Stetson Law on Feb. 8, 2020, as the new Culverhouse Chair to teach “Critical Race Judgments: Critical Race Theory and Supreme Court Decision making.”

Carbado launched the Saturday morning class with a racial determination exercise where he first described one parent as black and another parent as white. He then asked students to classify the child as black, white, biracial, multiracial, or other. He repeated this exercise multiple times with different combinations of the child’s parents including white, black, Latino, and Asian. The takeaway from this exercise was to see that society does not take into account how a person identifies himself or herself. Rather, society primarily views people based on their physical features.

At the end of the exercise, Carbado posed the question: Should people have the right to choose their own race? It was a topic he would circle back to at the end of the class.

This icebreaker segued into a discussion on the landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education, which declared that racial segregation in public school was unconstitutional. It was a decision that went against the will of the majority Americans and an achievement that was not without controversy. Carbado explained that progress has not been linear, but rather can be described as ebb and flow. When slavery was abolished, there was a backlash and Jim Crow laws were enacted. After the victory in Brown v. Board of Education, more lynchings started to occur. When the Civil Rights Act was passed, many people and businesses resisted integration.

Students participated in a special Culverhouse Chair lecture.
Students participated in a special Culverhouse Chair lecture.

The class discussion about the ebb and flow of progress led Carbado to explain the concept of “racial math.” Slavery produced racial inequality. Then there was some civil rights intervention during the period of Reconstruction. If you take the racial inequality and subtract the civil rights intervention during Reconstruction, Carbado explains that you can only get two possible answers: The first answer is that there is zero racial inequality. The second answer is that there is still some racial inequality. After Reconstruction, most everyone agrees there was still some racial inequality, and Jim Crow laws increased the divide, but Brown v. Board of Education helped offset some of the inequality. Still, society was left with some racial inequality rather than zero racial inequality.

Carbado continued in this vein, going through much of the history of the United States and giving examples of when more racial inequality was added and when some racial inequality was subtracted. His point was that there has never been a moment in our history when the intervention has been enough to completely clear the slate or to have zero racial inequality. The accumulation of racial inequality has been a problem over hundreds of years.

After providing students this historical context, Carbado then broached how race is a social construction. He broke it down into five parts: The first part is the moment when people say that race matters now. People agree that race is a thing that is recognized. The second part is when people decide the relevant categories of race, such as black, white, or yellow. He encouraged students to look at the U.S. census over the years because there have been different racial categories over time. The third part is to determine what criteria to employ to stick people in the categories. Phenotype hasn’t been the only criteria used. Language, accent, and demeanor also are used to place people into racial categories. The fourth part is to map some experience such as slavery, freedom, or internment. The final part is to assign meanings to the different groups, such as those enslaved are inferior. Race, he said, is bound up with questions of social meaning.

Carbado will return to Stetson and continue teaching this course over spring break. Anyone interested in learning more about the topics can read his book, Acting White? Rethinking Race in “Post-Racial” America.

Superior Court Judge Tangela M. Barrie receives Wm. Reece Smith, Jr. Public Service Award from Stetson

The Hon. Tangela M. Barrie was the 2020 recipient of the Wm. Reece Smith, Jr. Public Service Award.
The Hon. Tangela M. Barrie was the 2020 recipient of the Wm. Reece Smith, Jr. Public Service Award.

The Hon. Tangela M. Barrie received the Wm. Reece Smith, Jr. Public Service Award during the annual Inns of Court Banquet at Stetson University College of Law on Feb. 5, 2020.

The prestigious Wm. Reece Smith, Jr. Public Service Award recognizes individuals who have provided outstanding contributions to public service, the justice system, and the community.

Judge Barrie, a 1997 Stetson Law alumna, is the youngest Superior Court judge ever elected to the circuit court in DeKalb County, Georgia. Elected in 2008 at the age of 35, Judge Barrie handles felony cases ranging from theft to murder and a civil case load that includes adoptions, divorces, and more. In 2015, she was selected as Chief Judge for DeKalb County Superior Court and continues to serve as the presiding judge of Division 10 of the Stone Mountain Judicial Circuit.

With her strong family roots and commitment to community safety, Judge Barrie has dedicated herself to educating and empowering the community. She is an ardent advocate for young lawyers, offering an active Intern in Chamber Program.

“She has mentored me and other young lawyers active with the bar, teaching points of law and a commitment to professionalism in our field,” wrote Marisa Cioffi Dunn, a 2017 Stetson Law graduate who works as a staff attorney in Judge Barrie’s chambers and who nominated her for the award.

Judge Tangela Barrie speaking during the annual Inns of Court Banquet.
Judge Tangela M. Barrie speaks during the annual Inns of Court Banquet.

Prior to taking the bench, Judge Barrie was assigned to the DeKalb County District Attorney’s Office Domestic Violence/ Sexual Assault Unit. There, she worked vigorously advocating for the safety of women and other victims and was selected the 2007 Prosecuting Attorney of the Year for the successful prosecution of her cases.

Judge Barrie has received many other accolades throughout her career, all marking her devotion to bettering her community. For example, she earned:

  • The Boundless Commitment to the Community Award from the DeKalb County District Attorney’s Office in 2006;
  • The Bensonetta Tipton Lane Award in 2009 from the Georgia Association of Black Women Attorneys for her tireless dedication to family safety;
  • The DST 2016 Public Policy Change Agent Award from Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc.; and several others.

She is an active member of numerous service organizations, such as Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Inc. and the National Council of Negro Women. She is also on the board of various professional organizations, including the Wade Walker YMCA of Decatur and the Georgia Association of Black Women Attorneys.

“As a law clerk, I observe Judge Barrie’s courtroom almost daily,” Dunn wrote. “She is an excellent jurist with a  deep  knowledge  and understanding of the law. My favorite attribute of Judge Barrie is that she always does what she believes is right, never compromising her integrity to take an avenue that may be easier. Judge Barrie has taught me what it means to be a public servant, as she has committed her life and career to public service.” 

Dean Michele Alexandre with The Hon. Judge Tangela Barrie.
Dean Michèle Alexandre with The Hon. Tangela M. Barrie

Judge Barrie’s tireless work in her community is truly in keeping with the spirit of and inspiration for the Wm. Reece Smith, Jr. Public Service Award. Smith was a legendary Florida lawyer who dedicated more than 60 years to the legal profession, working to increase the legal services available to people who could not afford them. He was a member of the Stetson University College of Law Hall of Fame, joined the Stetson University College of Law faculty in 1954, and was named a distinguished professorial lecturer in 1991.

New course trains students to handle legal issues resulting from disasters

From left: Christine Cerniglia, associate professor and director of Clinical and Experiential Education; Linda Anderson Stanley, ABA director of Disaster Legal Services and the senior manager for Disaster Programming at Equal Justice Works; and Jean-Luc Adrien, Community Justice Project of Miami – Equal Justice Works Disaster Recovery Legal Corp. Fellow.

Stetson Law now offers a new course and corresponding externship experience designed to train students in an increasingly essential area of advocacy: disaster law.

The Disaster Law Primer is a one credit course offered over two weekends that provides a basic overview of disaster law including FEMA benefits, highlights systemic legal issues in a post-disaster world, and prepares students to complete and file a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) appeal.

With hurricanes and rising sea levels, not to mention other less predictable disasters such as oil spills, it behooves young lawyers – and their communities – to build the knowledge and skills needed to navigate FEMA benefits. Even for those who have studied the law, the government agency’s processes are not always intuitive.  Much of the United States is vulnerable to some type of disaster, whether it is a tornado, wildfire, hurricane or winter storm – Stetson students who plan to work elsewhere in the country after graduation are able to utilize the skills to help clients trying to rebuild their lives.

After disasters, the burden often falls heavily on legal aid offices and pro bono attorneys to help victims with legal issues. And despite the seemingly increasing occurrence of disasters, it is an area of law suffering from a dearth of experience and no standardized strategic approach, said Anthony Palermo, the ABA YLD District Representative who presented as part of the course. It is an important long-term problem that calls for a solution, and practical training courses such as the Disaster Law Primer could be the key.

Brittanny Perrigue, Texas Rio Grande Legal Aid Equal Justice Works Disaster Recovery Legal Corp. Fellow, was one of the guest lecturers.

The program was two years in the making, said Christine Cerniglia, associate professor and director of Clinical and Experiential Education. And in just two weekends, all 12 of the participants in the inaugural course reported they felt confident they could effectively tackle a FEMA appeal.

“We just created change agents,” said Cerniglia, who co-teaches the course with Linda Anderson Stanley.  Linda is the ABA Director of Disaster Legal Services and also the Senior Manager for Disaster Programming at Equal Justice Works. “We are lucky to have the expertise of Linda in the classroom who works on many systemic issues on a national level. The students are lucky to learn from her.”

Students study the role of agencies, legal aid offices, volunteer efforts, and government at both the state and federal level in a post-disaster context, particularly FEMA’s National Response Framework and the new standards for benefits under its Individual and Households Program. They focus, too, on the launch of Disaster Recovery Centers (DRC’s), legal issues relevant to Legal Aid offices, pro bono attorneys, and the responsibility of the American Bar Association and the State Bar to coordinate a response. Over the two-week period, students researched a specific disaster to understand how each scenario presents a different response and how all disasters impact the most vulnerable in our society. For the final assignment, students had to draft a FEMA appeal based on a fact pattern similar to what they would find after a disaster.

Michelle Walker
Michelle Walker

Michelle Walker, a part-time student in her third year, said the material was unlike anything she had been exposed to so far in law school and that it was a great, practical, hands-on opportunity. It helped put a personal, human face on the application of administrative law, which she found very helpful.

Walker was selected as the first Disaster Law Extern. The Primer course is a prerequisite for the Disaster Law Externship where students have a chance to put their newfound skills to use and work on actual FEMA appeals under the supervision of Equal Justice Works disaster fellows. Students who have successfully completed the primer may apply for the 1 credit externship at any point in their law school career. 

Stetson to launch 2nd Campus Climate Survey on Feb. 3

Spring 2020 Campus Climate Survey graphic

Stetson University, Stetson University College of Law and Pryor Education Insights will conduct a Campus Climate Survey to ask students, faculty and staff about the institution’s progress on becoming a more diverse, equitable and inclusive community.

The confidential survey will arrive by email on Monday, Feb. 3. The deadline to respond is Friday, March 6. 

Stetson University conducted its first campus climate survey in 2016, and the College of Law instituted a number of initiatives to promote diversity and improve campus climate as a result of its findings. For example:

  • A Diversity and Inclusion Committee, comprising faculty, staff and student members, was created to track the college’s progress on these issues. The group engaged the Student Bar Association’s diversity committee as it worked to increase cross-cultural interaction on campus.
  • The College of Law followed up on the committee’s suggestions by sponsoring several diversity and inclusion education sessions by Elon, Prism, Community Tampa Bay and others.
  • For students, various on-campus health resources were created in April 2017 to help with wellness, and at students’ request, results of Honor Code violations are published (anonymously) online, so that they know those are addressed and resolved appropriately.
  • Efforts to increase transparency and inclusion for staff included creating an internal, online organizational chart of the school’s leadership. A Staff Advisory Committee was created in 2018 to give them a stronger voice in College of Law decisions.
  • The College of Law’s search processes for open positions was changed to attract diverse candidates, resulting in more inclusive hiring for faculty and staff throughout the school.
dean michele alexandre
Dean Michèle Alexandre

“These and other tangible accomplishments are important to show students, faculty and staff that their opinions matter and can bring about change,” said Dean Michèle Alexandre. “I hope that each of you will take the time to complete the survey and provide meaningful feedback. The results will help us embark on new initiatives and take any needed action.”

The survey consultant, John Pryor and his Pryor Education Insights, is expected to present the results in fall 2020.

Pulitzer Prize-winning author to speak at Stetson Law

Professor James Forman Jr.
James Forman Jr.

Jan. 30, 2020 – Stetson University College of Law is excited to welcome Pulitzer Prize-winning author and Yale Law School Professor James Forman Jr. to campus as the keynote speaker for the Annual Inns of Court Banquet and Wm. Reece Smith, Jr. Distinguished Lecture on Feb. 5, 2020.

Professor Forman is the J. Skelly Wright Professor of Law at Yale Law School, and his book, Locking Up Our Own: Crime and Punishment in Black America, was awarded the 2018 Pulitzer Prize for General Nonfiction and featured on the New York Times’ 10 Best Books of 2017.

He has devoted much of his career to working with people who have been incarcerated. As a member of the Public Defender Service in Washington, D.C., he spent six years representing juveniles and adults charged with crimes.

During his time as a public defender, Forman became so frustrated with the lack of education and job training opportunities for his clients that he started the Maya Angelou Public Charter School, an alternative school for school dropouts and youth who had previously been arrested. A decade later, the institution expanded and agreed to run the school inside D.C.’s juvenile prison. That school, which had long been an abysmal failure, has been transformed under the leadership of the Maya Angelou staff. The court monitor overseeing D.C.’s juvenile system called the turnaround “extraordinary.”

Professor Forman, a graduate of Brown University and Yale Law School, taught at Georgetown Law from 2003 to 2011 before joining the Yale faculty. At Yale, he teaches Criminal Law and a seminar called Inside Out: Issues in Criminal Justice, in which Yale law students study alongside men and women incarcerated in state and federal prisons.

He teaches and writes in the areas of criminal procedure and criminal law policy, constitutional law, juvenile justice, and education law and policy. His particular interests are schools, prisons, and police, and those institutions’ race and class dimensions.

Wm. Reece Smith Jr. at Stetson University College of Law
Wm. Reece Smith, Jr.

Professor Forman’s lecture will be a wonderful addition to Stetson Law’s Annual Inns of Court Banquet, which brings together prominent lawyers, experienced teachers, and law students to exchange ideas, experiences, and education. The event includes The Wm. Reece Smith, Jr. Distinguished Lecture in Ethics, as well as the Wm. Reece Smith, Jr. Award. Both are named in honor of the legendary Florida lawyer who served as founder of Florida Legal Services, president of the International, American and Florida Bar Associations, a distinguished professorial lecturer at Stetson Law, and a member of the Stetson Law’s Hall of Fame.

Editor’s note: This year’s event is sold out.