This Article reviews the current three-prong approach that Florida district courts of appeal apply in determining whether to grant interlocutory certiorari review of a non-final trial court order, and presents an alternative test for Florida district courts of appeal to apply when making such a determination. The Authors present the shortcomings of the current approach and apply the proposed functional restatement to three types of orders in which the current test is likely to be problematic in its application and is likely to result in denial of certiorari review. The Authors then address the difficulties associated with convincing appellate courts to adopt the functional restatement and present potential shortcomings of the functional restatement. The Article concludes that the functional restatement should not be adopted in place of the current three-prong analysis, but that it can and should be used in arguing for the expansion of the types of orders reviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130.