This Article focuses on changes in campaign spending after the United States Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010. The Author explains that the Citizens United decision paved the way for an explosion of spending by nonprofit groups that do not have to disclose their donors and for the creation of super-political action committees (super-PACs) that can take in unlimited corporate, union, and individual donations. While super-PACs must disclose their contributors, these nonprofits do not, which has created a debate about whether nonprofits engaged in political activity should also be required to disclose contributors. The Author explains how some advocate that these new campaign-finance vehicles facilitate speech, while others argue that secret spending makes the political process less transparent, thus harming American democracy. Finally, the Author describes how efforts to require disclosure have thus far been unsuccessful and forecasts that the courts will ultimately decide this issue.