There are many sides of guardianship adjudications. Attorneys may find themselves on any one of those sides at any given time. This Article reviews the many sides of the guardianship adjudication process and addresses the core ethical considerations that attorneys have regardless of which side is represented. The analysis then turns to specific client-attorney situations framed in guardianship-adjudication case studies, offering ethical analysis in the context of the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Professional Conduct (Model Rules). The Article also references the ethics analysis and commentary found in several other professional legal publications, including the newly published Aspirational Standards and Commentaries of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA) and the newly published fourth edition of the Commentaries of the American College of Trust and Estates Counsel (ACTEC).