In Save the Homosassa River Alliance, Inc. v. Citrus County, Florida, the Fifth District Court of Appeal broadened the scope of citizens’ standing to challenge whether development decisions are consistent with a local government’s comprehensive plan. In defining the meaning of an aggrieved or adversely affected party under Section 163.3215(2) of the Florida Statutes, the court held that plaintiffs need only allege a particularized interest, and not a particularized harm, in order to satisfy the statutory requirement that their grievance exceeds in degree the general interest in community good shared by all persons. Thus, the court held that an environmental group and its individual members who “demonstrated concern for the protection of the interests furthered by the comprehensive plan” had standing under Section 163.3215(2).