While bioethics scholars and advocates have traditionally focused on individual rights, such as human-subject research and gene editing, some have recently begun to apply social justice principles to address community wide issues such as access to healthcare. Organizations, such as The Center for Practical Bioethics, have been successful at addressing community wide bioethical concerns, especially as it relates to healthcare. Similarly, community lawyering has focused on empowering poor or oppressed groups to create social change, build power, and establish leadership within communities. These efforts are largely grassroots mobilization though townhall meetings, door knocking, and face-to-face meetings. Community lawyers engage in a wide range of practices, including workers’ rights, immigration, children’s rights, public benefits, environmental rights, community economic development, and intellectual property. Community lawyers often partner with local groups and organizations to maximize their impact. As such, community lawyers and bioethics groups could maximize their impact on community bioethics concerns by partnering together. But who should community lawyers partner with and what are the drawbacks of the partnership? Community lawyers should partner with groups which target specific bioethics concerns at issue in their community including local hospitals and medical clinics. However, partnering with hospitals and medical clinics will create unique issues which community lawyers will have to address. Common issues, such as maintaining sustained community involvement, will not be the only issues community lawyers face when partnering with hospitals and clinics. Potential conflicts of interest and concerns over privacy and confidentiality are unique issues community lawyers and bioethics organizations may face during their partnership. Nevertheless, finding a way to overcome these challenges to serve their community’s needs will have a monumental impact.