Stetson Law Review’s Online Forum boasts both a general Online Publication Journal, and one special channel, known as the Unending Conversation.
The Online Forum’s general publication is a place for faculty and student’s of Stetson Law to publish exceptional pieces online that receive great recognition within our legal community and our campus.
The Unending Conversation (UC) is a specialized channel that publishes shorter, responsive essays to address topics relevant to all things legal writing—the career, the skills, the pedagogy—the list goes on and on. The goal is that with every essay produced, another will be written in response, creating what we have termed the ‘Unending Conversation.’
- Gut Renovations, Rubrics, and the Reduction of Bias in Standard Edited American English and Legal Writing
- Legal [Pedagogy] Scholarship: Why It Counts
- We Can And We Should: The Case For Original Research In Legal Academia
- A New Parlor Is Open: Legal Writing Faculty Must Develop Scholarship On Generative AI And Legal Writing
- A Tale of Two Disciplines: Legal Writing—A World of Haves and Have-Nots
- The Unending Conversation: Gut Renovations and No-Demo Renos
- Legal [Writing] Scholarship: Why It Counts
- Marginalization Matters: Discipline-Building in the Legal Writing Community
- The Critique is on the Glass: The Extension of Museum-Presentation Techniques to Substantively Advance Law School Pedagogy
- Mental Health Parity: More Important than Ever Post-COVID
- The Unending Conversation in Legal Writing Scholarship: An Introduction
- Yes, We Can: Embrace The Case for Plagiarism to Enhance Access to Justice
- I Mua Kākou: A Response to Dean Dickerson’s Call to “Abolish Caste”
- The Legal Writing Community’s Bonds Enable It to Flourish
- The Unending Conversation: Gut Renovations, Comparative Legal Rhetoric and the Ongoing Critique of Deductive Reasoning
- When the Sum of the Parts are More than the Whole: How Fully Secured Creditors Can Be Preferred in Bankruptcy
- Judicial Selection in a Hyper-Politicized Democracy
- On Measuring Damages Where a Contract Breach Benefits the Promisee: Response to Mark Giancaspro, Quantifying Damages in Cases of Advantageous Breach: The Curious Case of McDonald’s Milkshakes
- Should the Florida Courts Adopt the Federal Twombly Standard For Motions to Dismiss?
- Exploring Non-prosecutorial Justice Alternatives in America
- Live Critique of Oral Arguments: Response to Amanda L. Sholtis, Say What?: A How-To Guide on Providing Formative Assessment to Law Students Through Live Critique
- Pulling Back the Curtain on the Great and Powerful Oz*: SCOTUS and Title VII