Post West Virginia v. EPA the Administrative State’s Door is Still Ajar Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Jaclyn Lopez, Post West Virginia v. EPA the Administrative State’s Door is Still Ajar, 98 St. John's L. Rev. 653 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. EPA, which carves out a new rulemaking standard for Congress and federal agencies, may be as significant for its articulation of the Major Questions Doctrine (“MQD”) as it is for its treatment of Article III standing and jurisprudential mootness. This Essay examines lower courts’ subsequent treatment of West Virginia v. EPA to add dimension to the inquiry of whether the new MQD has upended the administrative state or if it is merely another arrow in the quiver for judges that prefer a weaker federal government or nondelegation altogether. It also explores whether the opinion, in reaching its MQD merits, redefined the contours of standing and mootness jurisprudence.