Caveat Emptor: A Conflict of Ideologies Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Tim Kaye, Caveat Emptor: A Conflict of Ideologies, 140 New. L.J. 911 (1990)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Tim Kaye, Caveat Emptor: A Conflict of Ideologies, 140 New. L.J. 911 (1990)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor, 1988 Supreme Court Term: What’s Left of the Bill of Rights?, 3 BNA Criminal Practice Manual 485 (1989)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Peter Lake, Book Review, Mark W. Janis, An Introduction to International Law, 12 Fordham Int'l L.J. 882 (1989)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Paul Boudreaux, Booth v. Maryland and the Individual Vengeance Rationale for Criminal Punishment, 80 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 177 (1989)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor, Tax Fraud – Mail Fraud: Synonymous, Cumulative or Diverse, 57 U. Cin. L. Rev. 903 (1989)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Linda S. Anderson, United States v. Azure: Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases, 15 Journal of Contemporary Law 285 (1989)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Tim Kaye, Surveying the Scene: A Valuer’s Duty of Care, 52 Modern L. Rev. 841 (1989)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Tim Kaye, Review of G. Rubin, War, Law and Labour; W. Hamish Fraser, Conflict and Class, 10 J. Legal Hist. 119 (1989)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor, Criminal Misconduct: Ethical Rule Usage Leads to Regulation of the Legal Profession, 61 Temp. L. Rev. 1323 (1988)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This article examines the evolution of ethical rules for lawyers and judges, and considers the various forums in which these rules have appeared. The article centers upon the use of these rules in the context of a criminal trial of an attorney or judge and discusses the court's preliminary finding of materiality and/or relevance of the ethical rules to the issues of the criminal trial. In those cases in which the courts have found ethical rules admissible as evidence or as a jury instruction, they are admitted as either a "rule of law' or as a "guidance." The distinction between these two roles is studied, as well as the prejudicial effect of admitting the rules. Finally, the article reflects upon the harms which accrue by the admission of these ethical rules, and the remedies available to curtail future application of these ethical rules in criminal trials of judges or attorneys.
Date of Publication:
Rebecca C. Morgan and Barbara Harty-Golder, Constitutional Development of Judicial Criteria in Right to Die Cases–From Brain Dead to Persistent Vegetative State, 23 Wake Forest L. Rev. 721 (1988)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.