Species…In Law Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Paul Boudreaux, Species…In Law, 50 Texas Envtl. L. Journal 1 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Articles
The Civil Self-Representation Crisis: The Need for More Data and Less Complacency Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Christine E. Cerniglia, The Civil Self-Representation Crisis: The Need for More Data and Less Complacency, 27 Geo. J. on Poverty L. & Pol'y 355 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
[Classical] Lawyers As [Digital] Public Speakers: Classical Rhetoric and Lawyer Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Kirsten K. Davis, [Classical] Lawyers As [Digital] Public Speakers: Classical Rhetoric and Lawyer, 20 Nev. L.J. 1137 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Arguably the contexts of speaking and writing for lawyers of ancient Greece and Rome and lawyers of today could not be more different. But, classical rhetorical theory, developed 2,000 years ago for face-to-face interactions in public squares and courtrooms, can be productively applied to improve our understanding of modern lawyers’ digital communication practices. This article first argues that lawyers have an ethical responsibility to write as “citizen lawyers” and provide legal commentary in the digital public sphere. Then, applying classical rhetorical theory, this article explores the problems and possibilities of lawyers’ digital rhetoric. The article is not a handbook of rhetorical techniques; rather it offers lawyers a rhetorical perspective on public commentary in a digital environment.
International Legal Developments Year in Review: 2019: Introduction Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Jason S. Palmer and Kimberly Y. W. Holst, International Legal Developments Year in Review: 2019: Introduction, 54 Year in Review: An Annual Survey of International Legal Developments and Publications of the ABA Section of International Law 1 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Who’s Got a Golden Ticket?—Limiting Creditor Use of Golden Shares to Prevent a Bankruptcy Filing Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Theresa J. Pulley Radwan, Who’s Got a Golden Ticket?—Limiting Creditor Use of Golden Shares to Prevent a Bankruptcy Filing, 83 Alb. L. Rev. 101 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Tainted Harvest: Transborder Labor Trafficking and Forced Servitude in Agribusiness Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Luz Estella Nagle, Tainted Harvest: Transborder Labor Trafficking and Forced Servitude in Agribusiness, 37 Wis. Int'l L.J. 511 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Transborder labor trafficking and forced servitude in the global commercial agriculture sector are serious problems that adversely impact farming communities and labor migration patterns. They also constitute violations of basic human rights with regards to personal liberty, freedom of movement, and the right to work for fair wages. Yet, the farm labor cost savings are a powerful incentive for growers and agribusinesses to engage directly or indirectly through corrupt labor recruiters and brokers in the domestic and transborder trafficking of farm workers. This article addresses farm labor trafficking in the United States and abroad, including a discussion of labor trafficking and forced servitude in the rapidly growing marijuana cultivation industry.
In Times of Chaos: Creating Blueprints for Law School Responses to Natural Disasters Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Christine E. Cerniglia et al., In Times of Chaos: Creating Blueprints for Law School Responses to Natural Disasters, 80 La. L. Rev. 421 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
A recent onslaught of domestic natural disasters created acute, critical needs for legal services for people displaced and harmed by storms and fires. In 2017, Hurricanes Harvey, Irma, Maria and Michael struck much of Texas, Florida, and Puerto Rico, displacing millions from their homes. Wildfires burned throughout California and tested the capacity of pro bono and legal aid systems across the state. In 2018, Hurricane Florence flooded North Carolina, and Hurricane Michael devastated the Florida Panhandle. California again suffered wildfires, the largest and most devastating in recorded history. Natural disasters are both more common and more destructive, the “new abnormal.”
Social and economic inequities emerge sharply after each natural disaster. Low-income and vulnerable people both suffer more from disasters and experience heightened barriers to accessing the post-disaster resources necessary to survive, rebuild, and return home. Marginalized and vulnerable populations, in particular, need legal assistance and expertise to overcome these barriers.
Natural disasters also inspire law students, law clinics, law schools and law faculty to help. Law school responses to assisting with post-disaster legal needs have been diverse. Some efforts have been law student initiated, while several law school clinics have provided legal assistance in a variety of ways. Some law schools have launched clinics with a devoted budget and strict focus on disaster practice. Some took on disaster work because it was the greatest need for existing clients and communities. Others shifted the focus of existing clinics to disaster needs, and still others launched temporary clinics in various forms to respond to acute crises. Some wanted to help but did not have ready relationships or resources to be responsive.
Each of the authors has direct experience surviving natural disasters and providing legal assistance from within the academy. This article provides necessary information about the nature of natural disasters, the ecosystem of response systems, and common legal issues for law schools and clinical programs interested in providing legal assistance to disaster-affected communities. It then describes varying models of law school institutional responses to increasingly common natural disasters. Building on lessons learned through these experiences, law schools can develop a blueprint for community-engaged disaster response. Building a framework for institutional responses in the legal academy can advance and improve access to justice for vulnerable communities recovering after a disaster and can provide students with an opportunity to learn from this social justice engagement.
Serving-up the Ace: Understanding Adverse Childhood Experiences (“ACE”) in Dependency Adoption through the Lens of Social Science Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Cynthia Hawkins DeBose and Taylor Scribner, Serving-up the Ace: Understanding Adverse Childhood Experiences (“ACE”) in Dependency Adoption through the Lens of Social Science, 54 U. Mich. J.L. Reform Online 1 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Supreme Court News Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Louis J. Virelli and David S. Rubenstein, Supreme Court News, 45 Administrative & Regulatory Law News 23 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The Wrongful Death of an Indian: A Tribe’s Right to Object to the Death Penalty Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Grant Christensen, The Wrongful Death of an Indian: A Tribe’s Right to Object to the Death Penalty, 68 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 404 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This Essay responds to the execution of Lezmond Mitchell, the only American Indian on federal death row. The execution was carried out on August 26, 2020 over the objection of both members of the victims’ family and the Navajo Nation. This Essay takes the clear position that because the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 requires tribal consent to seek the death penalty for murder, or felony murder predicted on robbery or kidnapping, that tribal consent should also have been required before the United States sought the death penalty in a carjacking case. The interpretation by the Ninth Circuit and the decision by the Executive to proceed with the execution undermine tribal sovereignty and are contrary to both congressional intent and statutory interpretation.