Date of Publication:
Theresa J. Pulley Radwan, Really–You Shouldn’t Have: How Gift Cards Are Not Such a Gift in Bakruptcy, 49 Uniform Commercial Code Law Journal (2019)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor, Bennett Gershman on the Prosecutor’s Role as “Minister of Justice”, 16 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 399 (2019)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Michèle Alexandre, Race, Space and Democracy: Locally-Based Strategies for Development, 44 The Harbinger 1 (2019)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Cynthia Hawkins DeBose and Brien V. Squires, Throwing the Baby Out with the Bath: Florida’s Flawed Approach to Post-Adoption Inheritance, 18 Conn. Pub. Int. L.J. 187 (2019)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor, Bruce Jacob: A leading Voice in Public Defense, 48 Stetson L. Rev. 305 (2019)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This Essay examines the events that led to Dean Emeritus Bruce Jacob being the recipient of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers’ (NACDL) prestigious Champion of Indigent Defense Award. Dean Jacob represented the State of Florida in the Gideon v. Wainwright case, arguing for adherence to Betts v. Brady which did not provide the right to counsel for indigent state defendants absent special circumstances. After arguing Gideon in the Supreme Court, he spent much of his career advocating for indigent defendants’ rights to effective assistance of counsel. Although some may find an irony in these two roles, this Essay notes the symmetry when looking at Dean Jacob as a true “minister of justice.”
Date of Publication:
Michèle Alexandre, Calling for a Community Economic Development Code of Ethics, 28 J. Affordable Housing & Commun. Dev. L. 219 (2019)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
On January 5, 2019, a group of legal scholars convened a Discussion Group at the AALS 2019 Annual Meeting to examine “race and privilege in Community Economic Development (CED)” with the goal of identifying how CED practice, in general, and experiential and doctrinal law school courses incorporating CED themes, more specifically, “serve to build bridges across racial and socioeconomic boundaries.” Comprised of both clinicians and non-clinicians, this group of scholars was asked to present elements of their individual research that spoke to this and related questions. Many insights were revealed and tested during this discussion. This essay reflects on a notion during the discussion around which there seemed to be consensus and enthusiastic support: that the sustainability of CED practice, as social movement, academic discipline, and legal service could be enhanced by articulating new guiding principles or a code of ethics to ground CED practice in normative principles applicable to communities across the country. The authors of this essay seek to memorialize that discussion and offer a roadmap for the creation of these principles/code of conduct by surfacing and exploring three specific questions:
(1) Why does this endeavor seem crucial?;
(2) How should CED practitioners create and formalize this statement of principles or code of ethics?; and
(3) What would be appropriate CED outcomes in light of the adoption of this statement of principles/code of ethics?
Date of Publication:
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Deregulating Corruption, 13 Harv. L. & Pol'y Rev. 471 (2019)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The Roberts Supreme Court has, or to be more precise the five most conservative members of the Roberts Court have, spent the last twelve years branding and rebranding the meaning of the word “corruption” both in campaign finance cases and in certain white-collar criminal cases. Not only are the Roberts Court conservatives doing this over the strenuous objections of their more liberal colleagues, they are also breaking with the Rehnquist Court’s more expansive definition of corruption. The actions of the Roberts Court in defining corruption to mean less and less have been a welcome development among dishonest politicians. In criminal prosecutions, politicians convicted of honest services fraud and other crimes are all too eager to argue to courts that their convictions should be overturned in light of the Supreme Court’s lax definition of corruption. In some cases, jury convictions have been set aside for politicians who cite the Supreme Court’s latest campaign finance and white-collar crime cases, especially Citizens United v. FEC and McDonnell v. United States. This Article explores what the Supreme Court has done to rebrand corruption, as well as how this impacts the criminal prosecutions of corrupt elected officials. This Article is the basis of a chapter of Professor Torres-Spelliscy’s second book, Political Brands, which will be published by Edward Elgar Publishing in late 2019.
Date of Publication:
Royal C. Gardner et al., Advocating for Science: Amici Curiae Brief of Wetland and Water Scientists in Support of the Clean Water Rule, 39 Wetlands 403 (2019)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The Trump administration has proposed replacing the Clean Water Rule, a 2015 regulation that defined the statutory term "waters ofthe United States" to clarify the geographic jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act. Since its promulgation, the Clean Water Rule has been subjected to numerous judicial challenges. We submitted an amici curiae brief to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, explaining why the Clean Water Rule, and its definition of "waters of the United States," is scientifically sound. The definition of "waters of the United States" is a legal determination informed by science. The best available science supports the Clean Water Rule’s categorical treatment of tributaries because compelling scientific evidence demonstrates that tributaries significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of traditional navigable waters (primary waters). Similarly, the best available science supports the Clean Water Rule’s categorical treatment of adjacent waters based on geographic proximity. Compelling scientific evidence demonstrates that waters within 100 ft of an ordinary high water mark (OHWM) significantly affect the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of primary waters, as do waters within 100-year floodplains and waters within 1500 ft of high tide lines of tidally influenced primary waters or OHWMs of the Great Lakes. This review article is adapted from that amici brief.
Date of Publication:
Ashley Krenelka Chase, Neutralizing Access to Justice: Criminal Defendants’ Access to Justice in a Net Neutrality Information World, 84 Mo. L. Rev. 323–70 (2019)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This Article examines net neutrality and its impact on criminal defendants’ ability to access the courts — and justice — through access to legal information. Research in the American legal system has moved largely online, and print resources are becoming increasingly expensive and, therefore, scarcer. The move to online legal research presents difficult issues in light of the recent demise of net neutrality: If meaningful and speedy access to the Internet becomes dependent upon being able to afford an Internet “fast lane,” users will be divided into the haves and the have-nots. Criminal defendants will surely fall into the latter category, rendering their access to justice completely non-existent.
This Article will examine the legislation, regulations, and cases that brought net neutrality to the attention of the American public. It will examine how net neutrality and access to information are related, particularly in the criminal justice system. It will discuss the United States Supreme Court decisions that have impacted criminal defendants and the methods that defendants use to seek the justice and access to the courts. In detailing how the demise of net neutrality will directly harm the millions of Americans who are currently impacted by the criminal justice system — either as a defendant or as a family member or friend of one — suggestions will be made to ensure that criminal defendants retain access to justice.
Date of Publication:
Erin Okuno, A Look Back at Sierra Club v. Costle: Balancing Legal, Political, and Ethical Interests in Informal Rulemaking, 44 Administrative & Regulatory Law News 18 (2019)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.