U.S. Ratification of CEDAW: From Bad to Worse? Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Ann Piccard, U.S. Ratification of CEDAW: From Bad to Worse?, 28 Law & Ineq. 119 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ann Piccard, U.S. Ratification of CEDAW: From Bad to Worse?, 28 Law & Ineq. 119 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Theresa J. Pulley Radwan and Rebecca C. Morgan, Today’s Elderly in Bankruptcy and Predictions for the Elderly of Tomorrow, 6 NAELA Journal 1 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Catherine J. Cameron, Fixing FOIA: Pushing Congress to Amend FOIA Section B(3) to Require Congress to Explicitly Indicate an Intent to Exempt Records from FOIA in New Legislation, 28 Quinnipiac L. Rev. 855 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Roberta Flowers, Ethics and Elder Law: Teaching Students to Ask the Right Questions, 40 Stetson L. Rev. 133 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Teaching professional responsibility generally is not an easy task, but when it is combined with the complicated issues in Elder Law, it poses obstacles, challenges, and great rewards. Many times the best way for practitioners to solve the ethical dilemmas they face is to know the right questions to ask. This Article discusses how using Elder Law examples to illustrate ethical issues can accomplish the following three goals: (1) teaching the general rules of professional responsibility using the lens of Elder Law; (2) exploring the unique roles played by Elder Law attorneys in the lives of their clients and their clients’ families; and (3) help the students learn to identify the questions and concerns raised in this particular area of law. Teaching ethics in an Elder Law context affords the students the opportunity to explore the roles of the Elder Law attorney and the need to recognize the questions and concerns in this area of law.
Date of Publication:
Roberta Flowers, The Role of the Criminal Defense Attorney: Not Just and Advocate, 7 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 647 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This essay was written for a symposium where several authors each analyzed the same factual hypothetical of a client planning to commit perjury. It argues that the lawyer’s ethical role must account for duties to the court and public, as well as the duties to the client. The tri-partite role of the attorney is the beginning point when dealing with what has been called the criminal defense attorney’s trilemma. The answer to the hypothetical posed is found in accepting the responsibility to fulfill each of the required ethical roles in any given situation. This essay argues that the situation of a client’s perjury should be analyzed with a recognition that each of the multiple roles implicate distinct responsibilities, and further that each role has an ethical perspective which must be considered and fulfilled in every action and decision the lawyer makes.
Date of Publication:
Tim Kaye, Rights Gone Wrong: The Failure of Fundamentalist Tort Theory, 78 Miss. L.J. 931 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Paul Boudreaux, Time Machine: Emma’s Legal Education, 59 J. Legal Educ. 454 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor, Intangible Rights – A Déjà Vu, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 73 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Rebecca C. Morgan, The Future of Elder Law Practice, 37 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 1 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Luz Estella Nagle, Terrorism and Universal Jurisdiction: Opening a Pandora’s Box, 27 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 339 (2010)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
In the wake of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, a compelling legal debate has arisen pertaining to whether terrorism is an international crime or a transnational crime, and if and in what context actors and acts, to which we affix the label of terrorist and terrorism, should or can be subject to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court and other criminal tribunals having universal jurisdiction. Some legal scholars believe terrorists acts should be subject to universal jurisdiction, while others believe that elevating terrorism to the same level of universally-recognized extreme crimes elicits several concerns. This article examines both sides of the debate and presents arguments that terrorism should remain outside the framework of universal jurisdiction.