Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor, Blogs and the Promotion and Tenure Letter, 84 Wash. U. L. Rev. 1109 (2006)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Should blogs count as legal scholarship for purposes of tenure? This essay looks at the line between legal scholarship and service. It considers the value of blogging and the role it should play in a person's tenure review.
Date of Publication:
Paul Boudreaux, A Case for Recognizing Unenumerated Powers of Congress, 9 N.Y.U. J. Legis. & Pub. Pol'y 551 (2006)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Many federal statutes are justified constitutionally as the regulation of interstate commerce. But it is disingenuous to characterize the Endangered Species Act, anti-discrimination law, and many criminal statues in this way. This article argues that it would be more honest, more straightforward, and better for the nation to recognize explicitly that Congress holds certain unenumerated powers. Using principles developed in the field of unenumerated individual constitutional rights, the article suggests categories for such rights, including fields in which states are discouraged from acting, fields that involve foreign affairs, and fields that implicate national symbols and future ideals. These limits would in turn offer hope for a strengthened system of federalism.
Date of Publication:
Linda S. Anderson, Protecting Parent-Child Relationships: Determining Parental Rights of Same-Sex Parents Consistently Despite Varying Recognition of Their Relationship, 5 Pierce L. Rev. 1 (2006)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This article discusses the potentially unseen effects of the different ways states recognize children of same-sex partners. It considers how states can allow or ban civil unions or same-sex marriages without causing uncertainty regarding parental rights and responsibilities. The article proposes changes to the Uniform Parentage Act and state statutes that would cause them to focus on the parent-child relationship rather than on the relationship of the parents.
Date of Publication:
Roberta Flowers, To Speak or Not to Speak: Effect of Third Party Presence on Attorney Client Privilege, 2 NAELA Journal 153 (2006)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Peter Lake and Darby Dickerson, A Blueprint for Collaborative Risk Management Teams, Campus Activities Programming (2006)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
D. Benjamin Barros, Home as a Legal Concept, 46 Santa Clara Law Review 255 (2006)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This article, which is the first comprehensive discussion of the American legal concept of home, makes two major contributions. First, the article systematically examines how homes are treated more favorably than other types of property in a wide range of legal contexts, including criminal law and procedure, torts, privacy, landlord-tenant, debtor-creditor, family law, and income taxation. Second, the article considers the normative issue of whether this favorable treatment is justified. The article draws from material on the psychological concept of home and the cultural history of home throughout this analysis, providing insight into the interests at stake in various legal issues involving the home.
The article concludes that homes are different from other types of property and give rise to legal interests deserving of special legal protection, but that these interests can be outweighed by competing interests in particular legal contexts. The result is that in many contexts special legal treatment of homes is justified. In other contexts, for example residential rent control, the strength of competing interests means that the law overprotects the home. In still other contexts, for example eminent domain law as embodied by the Supreme Court's recent decision in Kelo v. New London, the law tends to underprotect the home.
Date of Publication:
Will Bunting, Election-by-Lot as a Judicial Selection Mechanism, 2 N.Y.U. J.L. & Liberty 166 (2006)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The present paper urges the reader to overcome these barriers to scholarly appreciation, to cast to the side any preliminary skepticism toward election-by-lot as a reasonable allocation mechanism, and to take seriously for the moment, the claim that election-by-lot might be usefully employed in allocating certain judicial functions among a pool of potential candidates, the precise contours of which will be more fully defined shortly.
Date of Publication:
Jaclyn Lopez, Supreme Court Plurality Decision Muddies “Navigable Waters”, Section of Litigation, American Bar Association (2006)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Tim Kaye et al., Criticizing the Image of the Student as Consumer: Examining Legal Trends and Administrative Responses in the US and UK, 18 Educ. & L. 85 (2006)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
There is widespread concern that higher education is being compromised by being turned into a 'commodity' to be 'consumed'. This article represents an initial attempt to explore the trends in both the UK and US, and considers how the law has responded to them. It argues, however, that there is an important distinction to be drawn between 'commodification' and 'consumerism'. Education has always been a commodity to be bought and sold; the true danger lies in the move to a 'rights-based' culture where students (and politicians) see education merely as something to be 'consumed' rather than as an activity in which to participate. Whilst the law seems thus far to have been something of a bulwark against this movement, it remains an open question as to whether this will continue to be the case if higher education institutions do not themselves act more proactively in challenging this damaging view of higher education.