Date of Publication:
Royal C. Gardner, Legal Considerations, in Conservation and Biodiversity Banking (Nathaniel Carroll et al. eds., Routledge, 2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Kirsten K. Davis, The Jr. Faculty Forum: A Venue for Emerging Scholarship, AALS New Law Professors Section Newsletter (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Rebecca C. Morgan, The Uniform Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Act of 1997 – Ten Years of Developments, 37 Stetson L. Rev. 1 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Judith A.M. Scully, Seeing Color, Seeing Whiteness, Making Change: One Woman’s Journey in Teaching Race and American Law, 39 U. Tol. L. Rev. 59 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
In this article Judith Scully, a law professor, who identifies as a member of the Caribbean and African Diaspora , shares her personal and academic perspective of the experience and challenges faced in teaching Race, Racism, and American Law in a predominantly white institution. The article describes the emotional challenges of teaching this course and suggests ways to help students deconstruct their own belief/value systems. It also provides key ingredients needed in teaching this course such as empathic listening, allowing students to set the ground rules for dialogue and it includes a description of a typical first class meeting and how ground rules set the stage for an honest dialogue on race and American jurisprudence. Central to this discussion about race and American law are the legal history of the doctrine of colorblindness as established in Plessy v. Ferguson, and the concept of “white privilege” which is necessary for white students to understand when they are attempting to examine their own racial identity. This article includes a discussion of how white privilege is confounded by poverty and how the students often prefer to analyze the effect of poverty on one’s identity rather than have to wrestle with the impact that race has on one’s privilege and access to power. The article concludes that teaching a course such as this is a welcome challenge and is essential to raising race consciousness, to building sensitivity to the role of law in redressing and enforcing racial inequalities, and to examining the essential role of lawyers in both the justice system and community action initiatives.
Date of Publication:
Kirsten K. Davis, Commenting and Conversation, 22 Second Draft 14 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Royal C. Gardner, Rapanos and Wetland Mitigation Banking, in The Supreme Court and the Clean Water Act: Five Essays (Vermont Law School's Land Use Institute, Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Kirsten K. Davis, The Rhetoric of Accommodation: Considering the Language of Work/Family Discourse, 3 U. St. Thomas L.J. 530 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The language used to describe work-family issues reflects certain ways of thinking about the interconnectedness and segmentation of work and family. "Accommodate" or "accommodation" is a word that is often used in discussions about policies that apply to work and family. This article uses a cluster method of rhetorical analysis to look at the history of "accommodation" in legal discourse. It concludes that the use of the word "accommodation" in other legal contexts can constrain the ways of envisioning the roles, relationships, and possibilities for work and family in discussions about work-family policies.
Date of Publication:
Candace Zierdt and Ellen S. Podgor, Corporate Deferred Prosecution through the Looking Glass of Contract “Policing”, 96 Ky. L.J. 1 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This article examines deferred and non-prosecution agreements entered into between corporations and the Department of Justice (DOJ) through the lens of contract policing theory. It adds a new dimension to the contractual law now applicable to plea bargains and proffer agreements by suggesting key provisions that should be prohibited in deferred prosecution agreements. Three provisions common to many deferred prosecution agreements, or used by the government as leverage to secure a deferred prosecution agreement, are of particular interest here. These are: (1) the requirement of a corporation to waive its attorney-client privilege; (2) the determination of a breach of the agreement being within the sole province of the government; and (3) the provision that corporations not abide by previously negotiated contract terms that allow the corporation to pay the attorney fees of corporate employees. Specifically, this article examines the viability of specific provisions within these agreements when matched up against contract policing principles such as duress and unconscionability. This article concludes that corporations are deprived of basic contract rights as a result of the over-powering prosecutorial power used in reaching these agreements.
Date of Publication:
Joseph F. Morrissey, Rhetoric and Reality: Investor Protection and the Securities Regulation Reform of 2005, 56 Cath. U. L. Rev. 561 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Amidst all the recent publicity surrounding government action in combating corporate wrong-doing (passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the prosecution of the top brass at Enron and other scandal-ridden companies) little attention has been focused on the dramatic reform of the securities regulations that was enacted in late 2005. This article attempts to survey and assess the merits of that reform.
The new regulations essentially provide that most companies no longer have to comply with basic restrictions on the securities offering process that have been the cornerstone of the securities regulatory regime since its inception in 1933. Chief among these restrictions are those pertaining to communications. Where communications have traditionally been widely curtailed during a new offering of securities to the public, the new reforms now allow most companies to communicate with the public relatively freely. Further, the heightened liability that attached to communications prior to the reforms will not apply to the new free communications. In the name of efficiency the restrictions and heightened liability have been eliminated. At the same time, I will argue, investors actually are being left more vulnerable to potential manipulations of corporate wrongdoers. In addition, the article will directly call into question whether the SEC has in fact exceeded its rule making authority by altering so dramatically the very character of the regulatory regime that the Securities Act sought to construct.
Date of Publication:
Rebecca C. Morgan, Health Decisions and Directives About the End of Life, in Handbook of Gerontology: Evidence-Based Approaches to Theory, Practice & Policy (Wiley, 2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.