Date of Publication:
Royal C. Gardner, Legal Considerations, in Conservation and Biodiversity Banking (Nathaniel Carroll et al. eds., Routledge, 2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Kirsten K. Davis, The Jr. Faculty Forum: A Venue for Emerging Scholarship, AALS New Law Professors Section Newsletter (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Judith A.M. Scully, Seeing Color, Seeing Whiteness, Making Change: One Woman’s Journey in Teaching Race and American Law, 39 U. Tol. L. Rev. 59 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
In this article Judith Scully, a law professor, who identifies as a member of the Caribbean and African Diaspora , shares her personal and academic perspective of the experience and challenges faced in teaching Race, Racism, and American Law in a predominantly white institution. The article describes the emotional challenges of teaching this course and suggests ways to help students deconstruct their own belief/value systems. It also provides key ingredients needed in teaching this course such as empathic listening, allowing students to set the ground rules for dialogue and it includes a description of a typical first class meeting and how ground rules set the stage for an honest dialogue on race and American jurisprudence. Central to this discussion about race and American law are the legal history of the doctrine of colorblindness as established in Plessy v. Ferguson, and the concept of “white privilege” which is necessary for white students to understand when they are attempting to examine their own racial identity. This article includes a discussion of how white privilege is confounded by poverty and how the students often prefer to analyze the effect of poverty on one’s identity rather than have to wrestle with the impact that race has on one’s privilege and access to power. The article concludes that teaching a course such as this is a welcome challenge and is essential to raising race consciousness, to building sensitivity to the role of law in redressing and enforcing racial inequalities, and to examining the essential role of lawyers in both the justice system and community action initiatives.
Date of Publication:
Rebecca C. Morgan, The Uniform Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Act of 1997 – Ten Years of Developments, 37 Stetson L. Rev. 1 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Kirsten K. Davis, Commenting and Conversation, 22 Second Draft 14 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Royal C. Gardner, Rapanos and Wetland Mitigation Banking, in The Supreme Court and the Clean Water Act: Five Essays (Vermont Law School's Land Use Institute, Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Paul Boudreaux, Biodiversity and a New Best Case for Applying the Environmental Statues Extraterritorially, 37 Envtl. L. 1107 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The federal courts have applied a presumption that environmental statutes do not apply to conduct overseas. Efforts to overcome this presumption through the supposed intent of Congress have largely failed. This Article argues for a new best case for applying environmental laws extraterritorially, focusing on the Endangered Species Act's powerful section 7. This best case would assert that (1) the overseas action affects interests within the United States, such as the interest in preserving biodiversity for future needs, and (2) the action would not create a clash with the expectations of foreign governments or culture.
Date of Publication:
Theresa J. Pulley Radwan, Keeping the Faith: The Rights of Parishioners in Church Reorganizations, 82 Wash. L. Rev. 75 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Paul Boudreaux, A New Clean Water Act, 37 Envtl. L. Reporter News and Analysis 10171 (2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The Supreme Court’s new federalism has struck its strongest blows so far on the Clean Water Act. In 2007, a sharply divided Court nearly struck down a large chunk of the Act’s protection of wetlands and other small waterways – five years after an earlier decision had narrowed the reach of the Act because of its supposed overreaching into state prerogative. Why has the Clean Water Act been the Court’s favorite target? One reason is that the statute was fatally flawed when enacted. Congress chose to cover "navigable waters," but its practical definition has never been clear. The result is a statutory and jurisprudential mess, with lessons that extend across issues of constitutional law, statutory construction, and, of course, federalism. This article proposes to jettison the Act’s reliance on the misguided term "navigable waters." Instead, the statute should directly regulate activities that substantially affect interstate commerce, such as fisheries, migratory birds, floods, and agriculture. An Act whose limits are tied to the law of the commerce power would be shielded from the federalist ax.
Date of Publication:
Elizabeth Ippolito Boals, State v. Sanchez: Case File and Teaching Guide (1st ed., NITA, 2007)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.