Date of Publication:
Louis J. Virelli, Introduction, Chief Justice Roberts’ Influence on the Supreme Court, 40 Stetson L. Rev. 661 (2011)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Darryl Wilson, Battle Galactica: Recent Advances and Retreats in the Struggle for Preservation of Trademark Rights on the Internet, 12 Journal of High Tech Law 1– (2011)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Michael S. Finch and Michael P. Allen, An Illustrated Guide to Civil Procedure (2nd ed., Aspen Publishers, 2011)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Louis J. Virelli, The (Un)Constitutionality of Supreme Court Recusal Standards, 2011 Wis. L. Rev. 1181 (2011)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Supreme Court recusal is one of the most timely and hotly contested issues in American law. Recent debate over when justices should be precluded from deciding certain cases has included public calls for the exclusion of Justices Thomas and Kagan from any future cases addressing the constitutionality of the controversial Affordable Care Act, the congressional testimony of two sitting justices, a letter from over 130 law professors successfully prodding Congress to introduce a new Supreme Court recusal reform bill, and numerous editorials in national print and electronic media outlets. Among the wide variety of voices in the discussion, a singular theme has emerged - more rigorous congressional regulation of Supreme Court recusal practice is needed to protect the integrity and legitimacy of the Court.
This discussion, however, misses the point. Lost in the impassioned debate about when justices should recuse themselves is a far more important and fundamental constitutional question: who should make that decision? This issue is at the core of our constitutional separation of powers and federalism principles, and should take center stage in the debate over Supreme Court recusal. This Article is the first to comprehensively apply separation of powers principles to the question of Supreme Court recusal, and argues that the Constitution requires that the Supreme Court be the sole arbiter of its own recusal standards. This argument shifts the focus of the debate from an ineffectual and unrealistic congressional command model, based primarily on notions of judicial ethics, to a more fundamental constitutional inquiry into the proper exercise of legislative and judicial authority. While this Article represents a significant break from current orthodoxy, it is imperative to situate the Court’s recusal decisions within the proper normative framework. Understanding the unconstitutionality of Supreme Court recusal standards should yield a more useful and transparent dialogue about the Court’s recusal practices going forward.
Date of Publication:
Andrew D. Appleby, Leveling the Playing Field: A Separate Tax Regime for International Athletes, 36 Brook. J. Int'l L. 605– (2011)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Taxation of international athletes is a failure. The lack of a single, consistent regime results in substantial enforcement difficulties for tax administrators as well as a massive compliance burden and potential double taxation for athletes. International athletes’ unique characteristics necessitate a separate tax regime. Athletes are extremely mobile and transient taxpayers and are often among the most highly compensated individuals in the world. They can earn substantial sums of money during very short periods in a particular country. And athletes often have vast freedom to decide where to reside and where to perform. The implications of this broken tax system run very deep due to the increasing commercialization and popularity of professional sports around the globe.
The purpose of this Article is threefold. First, to compare how six significant countries - the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, Brazil, and China - currently deal with the inherent problems of taxing extremely mobile, transient, high-income taxpayers with diverse income. Second, to illustrate that each country takes a very different - and often very convoluted - approach that has resulted in confusing, complex, and inconsistent regimes. And finally, to propose a solution that will benefit tax administrators and athletes alike. This Article presents a rough blueprint for a feasible regime that is simple, effective, efficient, and extremely beneficial for both tax administrators and athletes. Now the sports world will have to wait and see if any countries are willing to play ball.
Date of Publication:
Ann Piccard et al., Another Crack in the Thin Skull Plaintiff Rule: Why Women with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Who Suffer Physical Harm from Abusive Environments at Work or School Should Recover from Employers and Educators, 20 Tex. J. Women, Gender, & L. 165 (2011)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Luz Estella Nagle, Youth Gangs and Transnational Organized Crime in Europe, 27 Int'l Enforcement L. Reporter 705 (2011)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Michèle Alexandre, We Reap What We Sow: Using Post-Disaster Development Paradigms to Reverse Structural Determinist Frameworks and Empower Small Farmers in Mississippi and Haiti, 14 U. Pa. J.L. & Soc. Change 135 (2011)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The goal of this article is to extrapolate some key lessons from studying two pre-disaster structures that perpetuated environmental oppression and poverty as well as to develop post-development economic models in these disaster-stricken areas. Furthermore, the article considers the environmental movement as a vehicle for implementing the policies proposed. It also investigates how individuals within these deterministic structures can be empowered to overcome the structural realities that help perpetuate poverty and environmental oppression.
In so doing, this article borrows from Critical Race Theory’s notion of structural determinism to denounce the hierarchical structures promulgated by neutral rules in agricultural legislation and to further analyze the commonalities in the realities faced by farmers all over the world. It analyzes some structural and policy-based problems that have had detrimental effects on poor regions like Haiti and the Gulf Coast. Disasters like Katrina and the 2010 earthquake in Haiti exacerbate these problems and serve as reminders that these disparities need to be eradicated when implementing post-disaster development plans.
Consequently, this paper is divided into the following parts: Part I discusses the application of the structural determinist principle to the agricultural context in Mississippi and Haiti. Part II discusses the rural isolation discriminatory practices with regards to small farmers and the challenges faced by rural residents pre- and post-Katrina. Part III analyzes the challenges existing in Haiti pre-disaster. Part IV discusses the effects of American agricultural policies on small farmers domestically and abroad. Part V considers a model for post-disaster development that attempts to reverse the oppressive effects of current agricultural policies. Finally, Part VI explores the environmental movement’s potential for helping to implement post-disaster development plans.
Date of Publication:
James W. Fox, Reconstructing Citizenship: African-American Discourse, the Public Sphere, and the Initial Implementations of the Fourteenth Amendment, in Infinite Hope and Finite Disappointment: The Story of the First Interpreters of the Fourteenth Amendment (Elizabeth Reilly ed., University of Akron Press, 2011)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Luz Estella Nagle, Child Soldiers and the Duty of Nations to Protect Children from Participation in Armed Conflict, 19 Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 1 (2011)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.