Date of Publication:
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Justices Should Think of Quarter Pounders in Latest Money in Politics Case (2013)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Blood on Your Handset (2013)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Peter Lake, The Foundations of Higher Education Law for Student Affairs (2nd ed., NASPA, 2013)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Christine E. Cerniglia, Is Experiential Education Simply a Trend in Law School or Is It Time for Legal Education to Take Flight?, 60 Federal Lawyer 42 (2013)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Jaclyn Lopez, The New Normal: Climate Change Victims in Post-Kiobel United States Federal Courts, 8 Charleston L. Rev. 113 (2013)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Peter Lake, Welcome to Compliance U: The Board’s Role in the Regulatory Era, 21 Association of Governing Board's Trusteeship Magazine (2013)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Peter Lake, What the New Campus Safety Center Can Accomplish, Chronicle of Higher Education (2013)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, The Walking Dead Supreme Court (2013)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor and Bruce Green, Unregulated Internal Investigations Achieving Fairness for Corporate Constituents, 54 B.C. L. Rev. 73 (2013)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This Article focuses on the relationship between corporations and their employee constituents in the context of corporate internal investigations, an unregulated multi-million dollar business. The classic approach provided in the 1981 Supreme Court opinion, Upjohn v. United States, is contrasted with the reality of modern-day internal investigations that may exploit individuals to achieve a corporate benefit with the government. Attorney-client privilege becomes an issue as corporate constituents perceive that corporate counsel is representing their interests, when in fact these internal investigators are obtaining information for the corporation to barter with the government. Legal precedent and ethics rules provide little relief to these corporate employees. This Article suggests that courts need to move beyond the Upjohn decision and recognize this new landscape. It advocates for corporate fair dealing and provides a multi-faceted approach to achieve this aim. Ultimately this Article considers how best to level the playing field between corporations and their employees in matters related to the corporate internal investigation.
Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor, Criminal Law Pedagogy: Introduction, 10 Ohio St. J. Crim. L. 597 (2013)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.