Colombia Book Chapter
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Luz Estella Nagle, Colombia, in Comparative Counter-Terrorism Law (Kent Roach ed., Cambridge University Press, 2015)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
2015
The South Doesn’t Have a Monopoly on our Racist History Media
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, The South Doesn’t Have a Monopoly on our Racist History (2015)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
“The Millennials are Coming!”: Improving Self-Efficacy in Law Students Through Universal Design in Learning Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Jason S. Palmer, “The Millennials are Coming!”: Improving Self-Efficacy in Law Students Through Universal Design in Learning, 63 Clev. St. L. Rev. 675 (2015)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The Millennial generation has arrived in law school. This new generation of self-confident and extremely high-achieving learners merits a new interdisciplinary approach to legal education. Some institutions have explored formative assessments and regulated self-learning to improve academic success. Other universities have looked to universal design, specifically universal design in learning or universal design in instruction, as a mechanism for furthering educational goals for their students. All agree that a lack of self-efficacy can prevent Millennial students from overcoming challenges in their educational growth, and that high self-efficacy, the ability to put forth effort and persistence to successfully accomplish a goal, will lead to better learning outcomes and is a powerful predictor of educational success. None, however, have paired the theories of self-regulated learning and universal design in instruction as a vehicle to improve self-efficacy in the law school classroom. This article is the first to address the unique intersection of these learning theories and their potentially positive impact on self-efficacy for today’s learners.
Justiciability of All Human Rights: Scottish Independence As Redress for British Human Rights Abuses Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Ann Piccard, Justiciability of All Human Rights: Scottish Independence As Redress for British Human Rights Abuses, 24 Fla. J. Int'l L. 333 (2015)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Watch Out for the Bus: Tales of Cross-Training, Teams, and Rotating Duties in an Academic Law Library Book Chapter
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Ashley Krenelka Chase, Watch Out for the Bus: Tales of Cross-Training, Teams, and Rotating Duties in an Academic Law Library, in 5Partnerships and New Roles in the 21st-Century Academic Library: Collaborating, Embedding, and Cross Training for the Future (Bradford Lee Eden ed., Creating the 21st-Century Academic Library, Rowman & Littlefield, 2015)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Book Review, The Fourteenth Amendment and the Privileges and Immunities of American Citizenship. Kurt. T. Lash Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
James W. Fox, Book Review, The Fourteenth Amendment and the Privileges and Immunities of American Citizenship. Kurt. T. Lash, 30 Const. Comment. 567 (2015)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
In this essay I review Kurt Lash’s The Fourteenth Amendment and the Privileges and Immunities of American Citizenship. Lash has written perhaps the most important work to date on the background of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities Clause. This essay summarizes the basic insights and arguments of the book and then presents a critique of it on two levels. First, it argues that the background of the Privileges or Immunities Clause is more ambiguous than Lash suggests and that this background does not support Lash’s rejection of natural rights interpretations of the Clause. Second, and more fundamentally, the essay argues that Lash — consistent with some other contemporary originalists — assumes an overly narrow concept of the historical public in his pursuit of the public meaning behind the Clause. Given the formal and informal exclusions of women and minorities from public discourse and decision-making, it is impossible to speak of a unitary “public.” We should consider instead how to identify and incorporate multiple publics and to consider what such a multi-public or counterpublic approach to historical meanings might look like.
Corporate Democracy from Say on Pay to Say on Politics Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Corporate Democracy from Say on Pay to Say on Politics, 30 Const. Comment. 431 (2015)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The President of the Business Roundtable once infamously said that “corporations were never designed to be democracies…” American courts respectfully disagree and have repeatedly held that the democratic rights of shareholders are sacrosanct. The context for the Business Roundtable President’s comment was the battle over say on pay — a battle the Business Roundtable lost in the United States with the passage of the financial reform legislation known as Dodd-Frank.
As I will explain in this piece, courts’ robust conception of corporate democracy rights for shareholders should protect both shareholders’ ability to have a say on pay and say on politics. Say on pay is the practice in United States, among other nations, of mandating a non-binding shareholder vote on executive compensation at publicly traded firms. A shareholders’ say on politics does not yet exist in America. But theoretically, just as say on pay mandates shareholder democracy in the case of executive remuneration, say on politics would require shareholders to vote on corporate political spending. Binding say on politics votes already exist in the U.K.
Critiques of say on pay and say on politics have been couched as constitutional objections based on either the Tenth or First Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. But at their heart, these objections seem less rooted in the text of the Constitution and more inspired by a cribbed conception of shareholders’ corporate voting rights. To untangle who has the stronger legal argument requires a review of how American courts have conceptualized “corporate democracy.” I conclude that as framed by key courts such as the U.S. Supreme Court, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals and the Delaware state courts, “corporate democracy” is a capacious enough concept to justify both shareholders’ say on pay and say on politics.
State v. Sanchez: Case File and Teaching Guide Miscellaneous
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Elizabeth Ippolito Boals, State v. Sanchez: Case File and Teaching Guide (2nd ed., NITA, 2015)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Legal Research Using Google Scholar Book Chapter
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Ashley Krenelka Chase, Legal Research Using Google Scholar, in 2Google in Libraries: Research, User Applications, and Networking (Carol Smallwood ed., Rowman & Littlefield, 2015)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
International Environmental Law Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Royal C. Gardner, International Environmental Law, 49 American Bar Association Section of International Law Year in Review 339 (2015)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.