The Mueller Investigation and Beyond Book
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Ellen S. Podgor et al. (eds.), The Mueller Investigation and Beyond (Carolina Academic Press, 2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor et al. (eds.), The Mueller Investigation and Beyond (Carolina Academic Press, 2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Elizabeth Berenguer et al., Gut Renovations: Using Critical and Comparative Rhetoric to Remodel How the Law Addresses Privileges and Power, 23 Harv. Latinx L. Rev. 205 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Louis J. Virelli et al., Administrative Law: Cases and Materials (8th ed., 2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Darryl Wilson and Jason W. Hirata, Keeping Current–Property, 34 Probate and Property 18 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Robyn Powell et al., Perceived Community-Based Needs of Low-Income Parents with Psychiatric Disabilities Who Experienced Legal Challenges to Their Parenting Rights, 112 Children and Youth Services Review 104902 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Substantial numbers of US parents with psychiatric disabilities are highly vulnerable to loss of child custody or visitation, through child welfare system involvement or divorce proceedings. This study describes the community-based needs of parents with psychiatric disabilities who experienced legal challenges to their parenting rights. This exploratory study involved semi-structured telephone interviews with twelve former clients of a legal services program that provides representation to low-income parents with psychiatric disabilities facing challenges to child custody or visitation. Interviews were audio-recorded, professionally-transcribed, and analyzed using a qualitative, content analysis approach. Three broad themes emerged regarding the types of supports parents reported as useful for their well-being: (1) informal support networks; (2) responsive mental health care for the whole family; and (3) meaningful legal representation. Within these three areas, unmet needs were frequent and problematic. A fourth theme emerged: chronic economic hardships and material deprivation, which point to unmet financial needs. The needs and supports described in this study should be addressed through the development of comprehensive services and supports that meet the psychosocial, legal, and socioeconomic needs of parents with psychiatric disabilities and their children. Future research is also warranted.
Date of Publication:
Paul Boudreaux, Opportunity Zones: A Better Plan for Place-Based Help for Low- Income Communities?, in Virtual Land Use Institute 2020 (May 1, 2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, Elegy for Anti-Corruption Law: How the Bridgegate Case Could Crush Corruption Prosecutions and Boost Liars, 69 Am. U. L. Rev. 1689 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This piece discusses how the case Kelly v. United States, which was pending before the Supreme Court when this piece was written, was likely to expand two different developments in the Roberts Court’s jurisprudence: (1) expanding the constitutional protections for lying under the First Amendment and (2) narrowing the definition of corruption. This Piece describes how lower courts ruled in the Kelly case as well as arguments deployed by Kelly’s lawyers at the Supreme Court to try to exonerate their client Bridget Anne Kelly for her role in the Bridgegate scandal.
Epilogue: As this piece was being printed, the Supreme Court decided Kelly v. United States, 590 U. S. ____ , No. 18-1059 (U.S. May. 7, 2020). As predicted by the piece, the Supreme Court in Kelly expanded the Skilling case and narrowed what counts as corruption concluding “not every corrupt act by state or local officials is a federal crime.”
Date of Publication:
Erin Okuno, Live Critique of Oral Arguments: Response to Amanda L. Sholtis, Say What?: A How-To Guide on Providing Formative Assessment to Law Students Through Live Critique (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
D. Benjamin Barros et al., Finding Friendship in a Contentious Place: A Conversation with Obergefell and Hodges From the Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case on Same Sex Marriage, vol. 51 2020-04-01Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
In the 2015 landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that same-sex couples had a fundamental right to marry as guaranteed by the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Despite being on opposing sides of one of the most important Supreme Court rulings in recent history, Jim Obergefell and Rick Hodges developed the most unlikely friendship. On February 13, 2020, along with our College of Law panel, Mr. Obergefell and Mr. Hodges discussed their unique roads to becoming the named parties in this landmark ruling.
Date of Publication:
Christine E. Cerniglia, The Civil Self-Representation Crisis: The Need for More Data and Less Complacency, 27 Geo. J. on Poverty L. & Pol'y 355 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.