Keeping Current-Property Incollection
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Darryl Wilson and Jason W. Hirata, Keeping Current-Property, 34 Probate and Property 18 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Darryl Wilson and Jason W. Hirata, Keeping Current-Property, 34 Probate and Property 18 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Erin Okuno, Live Critique of Oral Arguments: Response to Amanda L. Sholtis, Say What?: A How-To Guide on Providing Formative Assessment to Law Students Through Live Critique (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
D. Benjamin Barros et al., Finding Friendship in a Contentious Place: A Conversation with Obergefell and Hodges From the Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Case on Same Sex Marriage, vol. 51 2020-04-01Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
In the 2015 landmark case Obergefell v. Hodges, the U.S. Supreme Court declared that same-sex couples had a fundamental right to marry as guaranteed by the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Despite being on opposing sides of one of the most important Supreme Court rulings in recent history, Jim Obergefell and Rick Hodges developed the most unlikely friendship. On February 13, 2020, along with our College of Law panel, Mr. Obergefell and Mr. Hodges discussed their unique roads to becoming the named parties in this landmark ruling.
Date of Publication:
Christine E. Cerniglia, The Civil Self-Representation Crisis: The Need for More Data and Less Complacency, 27 Geo. J. on Poverty L. & Pol'y 355 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Paul Boudreaux, Species…In Law, 50 Texas Envtl. L. Journal 1 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Kirsten K. Davis, [Classical] Lawyers As [Digital] Public Speakers: Classical Rhetoric and Lawyer, 20 Nev. L.J. 1137 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Arguably the contexts of speaking and writing for lawyers of ancient Greece and Rome and lawyers of today could not be more different. But, classical rhetorical theory, developed 2,000 years ago for face-to-face interactions in public squares and courtrooms, can be productively applied to improve our understanding of modern lawyers’ digital communication practices. This article first argues that lawyers have an ethical responsibility to write as “citizen lawyers” and provide legal commentary in the digital public sphere. Then, applying classical rhetorical theory, this article explores the problems and possibilities of lawyers’ digital rhetoric. The article is not a handbook of rhetorical techniques; rather it offers lawyers a rhetorical perspective on public commentary in a digital environment.
Date of Publication:
Steven Lubet and Elizabeth Ippolito Boals, Expert Testimony: A Guide for Expert Witnesses and the Lawyers Who Examine Them, Fourth Edition (4th ed., NITA, 2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
D. Benjamin Barros et al., Property Law (2nd ed., Aspen Publishing, 2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Darryl Wilson and Jason W. Hirata, Keeping Current–Property, 34 Probate and Property 18 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Robyn Powell et al., Role of Family Caregivers Regarding Sexual and Reproductive Health for Women and Girls with Intellectual Disability: A Scoping Review, 64 Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 131 (2020)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
While people with intellectual disability (ID) face disparities relating to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, little is known about the role of family caregivers who assist women and girls with ID access SRH services. This scoping review examined the findings of studies to elucidate the role of family caregivers with regard to SRH for women and girls with ID.
We used Arksey and O'Malley's six-stage scoping framework, with Levac, Colquhoun and O'Brien's revisions, to evaluate identified sources. We searched three electronic databases, six ID journals and reference lists in full-text articles. Inclusion criteria included (1) primary and secondary source research studies in peer-reviewed journals; (2) published in English; (3) all research methodologies (i.e. qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods and systematic reviews or commentaries); (4) published between 2000 and 2016; and (5) studies from any country.
The search yielded 2062 studies; 57 articles met inclusion criteria. Most studies employed purposive, convenience or criterion sampling. Participants included people with ID, family caregivers, paid caregivers and health-care professionals. Findings were summarised thematically: (1) menstruation and menopause; (2) vaccinations and preventive screenings; (3) supporting sexuality and healthy relationships; (4) coordinating with health-care providers and (5) contraception and sterilisation.
Findings from this scoping review underscore the need for more and better-quality research, including how family caregivers assist women and girls with ID access perinatal and preventive SRH services and sexual abuse education. Family caregivers, women and girls with ID and health-care providers need increased access to information about SRH.