Date of Publication:
Louis J. Virelli, The Underappreciated Virtues of the Supreme Court’s Ethics Code, 52 Hofstra L. Rev. 657 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Louis J. Virelli and Richard W. Murphy, Supreme Court News, 49 Administrative & Regulatory Law News 22 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Grant Christensen, Article III and Indian Tribes, 108 Minn. L. Rev. 1789 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Among the most basic principles of our federal courts is that they are courts of limited jurisdiction, exercising only those powers delegated to them in Article III. In 1985 the Supreme Court inexplicably created an exception to this constitutional tenant, and unilaterally declared a plenary judicial power to review the exercise of an Indian tribe’s inherent sovereign authority. This exception is unmoored from all other Supreme Court precedent outside Indian law, and unjustifiably assumes the judicial power in direct contrast to the Court’s ordinarily thoughtful jurisprudence on Article III and deference to the separation of powers.
This article concludes that the Supreme Court was wrong in 1985 when it assumed a plenary judicial power over Indian affairs. The consequences are profound, and suggest a reconceptualization of the entire field of Indian law. Canon creating cases like Oliphant, Montana, and Cabazon should never have been decided because the exercise of a tribe’s inherent authority does not create a federal question conferring subject matter jurisdiction on the federal courts. The inherent power of Indian tribes to criminally prosecute or civilly regulate non-Indians in Indian country should not subject them to the judicially imposed limits set by the Supreme Court, because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to decide those cases. Until a treaty or statute creates an affirmative basis for federal court review, an Indian tribe’s inherent powers are subject to the checks and balances imposed by tribal government and no others.
Date of Publication:
Jaclyn Lopez, Between a Rock and a Hardened Place: Prioritizing Climate Resiliency for Vulnerable Biodiversity, 34 Duke Envtl. L. & Policy Forum 157 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Darryl Wilson and Shelby D. Green, Keeping Current – Property, 38 Probate and Property 20 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Kristen R. Moore and Angelina M. Vigliotti, Library Spaces as Wellness Spaces, 28 AALL Spectrum 36 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Robyn Powell et al., Family Caregivers’ Attitudes and Perspectives about the Sexual Reproductive Health of Women with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: An Online Survey, 129 American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 135 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Although sexual and reproductive health is critically important for women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), there is limited research elucidating the role of family caregivers in assisting women with IDD access sexual and reproductive health services and information. Understanding the family caregivers' attitudes and perspectives is essential to improving access to sexual and reproductive health services and information for women with IDD. A cross-sectional online survey of family caregivers of women with IDD was administered between June and October 2018. Quantitative analysis was conducted for closed-ended responses, and qualitative analysis was conducted for open-ended responses. The analytic sample included 132 family caregivers. Most participants were parents and reported being closely involved in their family member's access to sexual and reproductive health services and information. Although most participants expressed that sexual and reproductive health services and information are essential for women with IDD, qualitative analysis of participants' open-ended responses revealed both supportive and restrictive attitudes and perspectives on sexual and reproductive health services and information for women with IDD. Supportive attitudes and perspectives included (1) "knowledge is power;" (2) supported decision-making; and (3) protection against sexual abuse. Restrictive attitudes and perspectives included (1) dependent on the individual; (2) lack of autonomy; and (3) placing responsibility on disability. Greater attention from policymakers and practitioners to systems-level changes, including universal and accessible sexual education for women with IDD, supported decision-making, and sexual abuse prevention measures, are urgently needed.
Date of Publication:
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, The Stakes of the Supreme Court’s Pro-Corruption Rulings in the Age of Trump: Why the Supreme Court Should Have Taken Judicial Notice of the Post-January 6 Reality in Percoco, 133 Yale L.J. Forum 656 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
In Percoco, the Supreme Court squandered opportunities to contextualize political corruption. This piece argues that the Supreme Court should have taken judicial notice of the Post-January 6th circumstances which surround the decision. This is a perilous time in American democracy for the Justices to make prosecuting corrupt campaign managers arduous.
Date of Publication:
D. Benjamin Barros et al., Property Law (3rd ed., Aspen Publishing, 2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Kristen R. Moore, Field Note: Supporting Student Parents in Law School, in Supporting Student Parents in the Academic Library: Designing Spaces, Policies, and Services (Association of College and Research Libraries, 2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.