Date of Publication:
Ashley Krenelka Chase et al., Sentencing Pro (2026)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Sentencing Pro allows you to quickly find and generate imprisonment, fine, probationary, and supervised release ranges for complex federal criminal cases in a fraction of the time it would take manually.
Date of Publication:
Elizabeth Ippolito Boals et al., Cases and Problems in Criminal Procedure: The Police (8th ed., Carolina Academic Press, 2026)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This problem-based textbook creates for law students the experience that lawyers have when analyzing the constitutional issues involved in the investigatory phase of a criminal case. The problem approach engages students with complex constitutional materials and enhances learning by offering the professor and the students the opportunity to apply the case law that is presented in each chapter.
Each chapter begins with a layered, multi-issue problem presented in the form of a memo to a law clerk working in a variety of settings. The problem is followed by the relevant body of constitutional law edited to provide manageable material for law students and includes many notes offering direction to the students as they develop analytical skills.
Date of Publication:
Ashley Krenelka Chase and Thomas Maloney, cite [ai]de (2026)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Coming soon! Cite [ai]de is a formative feedback tool for legal citations, not a ghostwriter. It allows faculty to spend more time writing and less time buried in the footnotes, and helps students notice and correct citation issues in their own writing while leaving analysis and organization entirely in their hands.
Date of Publication:
Lauren D. Smith et al., Enhancing Perinatal Care for Women With Intellectual Disabilities: Clinician Insights on Involving Family Caregivers, 39 Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities e70194 (2026)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Women with intellectual disabilities experience disparities in perinatal outcomes and unmet needs in perinatal care. Many women with intellectual disabilities receive support from family caregivers, including accompaniment to healthcare visits. This qualitative study explores the experiences of obstetric care clinicians navigating perinatal care with family caregivers of women with intellectual disabilities.
Transcripts from interviews (n = 9) and a focus group (n = 8) with 17 obstetric care clinicians were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.
Four major themes emerged: (1) determining intellectual disability and guardianship status; (2) decision-making; (3) navigating ethical, legal, relational, and clinical challenges; (4) caregivers as an integral part of perinatal care.
Family caregiver involvement in perinatal care of women with intellectual disabilities has benefits but can also present challenges for obstetric care clinicians. Clinicians need guidance on how to appropriately manage perinatal care of women with intellectual disabilities.
Date of Publication:
Darryl Wilson, Keeping Current – Property, 40 Probate and Property 16 (2026)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Darryl Wilson, Mastering Property Law (2nd ed., Carolina Academic Press, 2026)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Gregory Schwab, Gubernatorial Emergency Powers, 58 Ariz. St. L.J. 707 (2026)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
For centuries, American state governance saw a steady, pragmatic expansion of gubernatorial emergency powers, establishing the governor as the primary crisis manager in the federal system. This long-standing tradition reached its zenith during the COVID-19 pandemic when all fifty governors deployed sweeping emergency measures. Yet this unprecedented exercise of executive power triggered an equally unprecedented legislative backlash. In many states, legislatures systematically stripped governors of emergency authorities that had evolved over generations. This Article argues this was not a thoughtful recalibration but a historically shortsighted, constitutionally suspect, and dangerous overcorrection.
First, it demonstrates that executive emergency authority was the product of deliberate accumulation over two centuries. Second, it argues that the recent legislative reforms are constitutionally flawed, violating core separation of powers principles by enabling legislative micromanagement of executive functions and, in many states, empowering gerrymandered, minoritarian legislatures to subvert the will of statewide majorities. These changes create a perilous mismatch between institutional capacity and crisis demands by shifting authority to deliberative bodies inherently ill-suited for emergency response.
When the next disaster strikes, governors will find emergency declarations expiring, federal aid jeopardized, and response capabilities fragmented. This legislative assault—often amounting to institutional revenge that conflates policy disagreements with constitutional crises—sacrifices public safety for partisan advantage. The Article proposes balanced reforms that preserve executive flexibility while ensuring democratic accountability.