Date of Publication:
Michael S. Finch, Florida Governmental Litigation: Integrating Claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983 and Florida Statutes 768.28, 29 Stetson L. Rev. 531 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Rebecca C. Morgan, Who Is the Client? Ethical Issues in an Elder Law Practice, 16 Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers 463 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Roberta Flowers, An Unholy Alliance: The Ex Parte Relationship between the Judge and the Prosecutor, 79 Neb. L. Rev. 251 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Luz Estella Nagle, The Cinderella of Government: Judicial Reform in Latin America, 30 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 101 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Royal C. Gardner, Money for Nothing? The Rise of Wetland Fee Mitigation, 19 Virginia Envtl. L. Journal 1 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Luz Estella Nagle, Columbia’s Faceless Justice: A Necessary Evil, Blind Impartiality, or Modern Inquisition?, 61 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 881 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
In the mid-1980s, Colombian drug lords declared all out war on Colombia’s judicial system in an effort to intimidate the Colombian government into canceling extradition agreements with the United States. Dozens of judges and prosecutors who could not be bribed were intimidated, assaulted, or assassinated as a means of impeding the work of the judiciary in prosecuting the so-called war on drugs. In an effort to protect the lives of Colombian judicial officials, extreme measures were taken to hide the identities of the judges and prosecutors hearing drug cases. The result was a secret court system out of which other issues of justice and human rights became an issue. This article examines in-depth the history of the Colombian legal system, the evolution of its judiciary, and the role of faceless judges as a means of fighting drug trafficking.
Date of Publication:
Cynthia Hawkins DeBose, Pan-Africanism, in Encyclopedia of Civil Rights in the United States (Patricia Sullivan and Waldo E. Martin, Jr. eds., Macmillan, 2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Luz Estella Nagle, United States Mutual Assistance to Colombia: Vague Promises and Diminishing Returns, 23 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1235 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Fighting globalized crime is dependent on cooperation between law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies among nations. Over the course of several decades, states have entered into reciprocal arrangements to improve the manner in which nations can reach across international frontiers to apprehend criminals and bring them to justice. As the leading drug trafficking source in the western hemisphere, Colombia has been the target of intense efforts by the United States to bring Colombian drug lords and their foot soldiers to trial in the United States where just is swift and lengthy prison sentences result. While the United States has expended billions of dollars in establishing mutual assistance arrangements, in practice, the results have been less than desirable as corruption and disorganized bureaucracies in Colombia impede effective cooperation. Some methods have been controversial as well and have raised sharp criticism from both sides. This article examines the mutual assistance arrangements between Colombia and the United States and provides a highly critical analysis of what works, what doesn’t work, and what can be done to fix the problems encountered in bringing transborder criminals to justice.
Date of Publication:
Ellen S. Podgor, Do We Need A Beanie Baby Fraud Statute?, 49 Am. U. L. Rev. 1031 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
This Essay examines the appropriate line in legislative drafting between the overly generic fraud statute (e.g., mail fraud) and the addition of an overly specific statute, such as "Beanie Baby" fraud. Clearly, issues of federalism warrant consideration to determine whether the conduct belongs in the realm of the state and local prosecutor or more aptly in the federal system. Likewise, the scope of the federal statute needs to be clear in order to avoid ambiguity, overbreadth, and application of the Rule of Lenity.
This Essay looks to a third factor for considering the propriety of the legislation: Whether the statute is designed to advance the historic roles provided to each of the three branches of government. When legislation accords a fair balancing to the executive, legislative, and judicial bodies, the appropriate line between the generic and specific statute is achieved.
Date of Publication:
Peter Lake, Common Law “Duty” Analysis: The Conceptual Expansion of “Duty” in a Period of Doctrinal Consolidation/Retrenchment, 10 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol'y 153 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.