Date of Publication:
Roberta Flowers, An Unholy Alliance: The Ex Parte Relationship between the Judge and the Prosecutor, 79 Neb. L. Rev. 251 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Luz Estella Nagle, The Cinderella of Government: Judicial Reform in Latin America, 30 Cal. W. Int'l L.J. 101 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Royal C. Gardner, Money for Nothing? The Rise of Wetland Fee Mitigation, 19 Virginia Envtl. L. Journal 1 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Luz Estella Nagle, Columbia’s Faceless Justice: A Necessary Evil, Blind Impartiality, or Modern Inquisition?, 61 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 881 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
In the mid-1980s, Colombian drug lords declared all out war on Colombia’s judicial system in an effort to intimidate the Colombian government into canceling extradition agreements with the United States. Dozens of judges and prosecutors who could not be bribed were intimidated, assaulted, or assassinated as a means of impeding the work of the judiciary in prosecuting the so-called war on drugs. In an effort to protect the lives of Colombian judicial officials, extreme measures were taken to hide the identities of the judges and prosecutors hearing drug cases. The result was a secret court system out of which other issues of justice and human rights became an issue. This article examines in-depth the history of the Colombian legal system, the evolution of its judiciary, and the role of faceless judges as a means of fighting drug trafficking.
Date of Publication:
Cynthia Hawkins DeBose, Pan-Africanism, in Encyclopedia of Civil Rights in the United States (Patricia Sullivan and Waldo E. Martin, Jr. eds., Macmillan, 2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Luz Estella Nagle, United States Mutual Assistance to Colombia: Vague Promises and Diminishing Returns, 23 Fordham Int'l L.J. 1235 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Fighting globalized crime is dependent on cooperation between law enforcement and prosecutorial agencies among nations. Over the course of several decades, states have entered into reciprocal arrangements to improve the manner in which nations can reach across international frontiers to apprehend criminals and bring them to justice. As the leading drug trafficking source in the western hemisphere, Colombia has been the target of intense efforts by the United States to bring Colombian drug lords and their foot soldiers to trial in the United States where just is swift and lengthy prison sentences result. While the United States has expended billions of dollars in establishing mutual assistance arrangements, in practice, the results have been less than desirable as corruption and disorganized bureaucracies in Colombia impede effective cooperation. Some methods have been controversial as well and have raised sharp criticism from both sides. This article examines the mutual assistance arrangements between Colombia and the United States and provides a highly critical analysis of what works, what doesn’t work, and what can be done to fix the problems encountered in bringing transborder criminals to justice.
Date of Publication:
Judith A.M. Scully, Women and Health, Voices of African American Women in the United States of America: The Unkept Promises of the Platform for Action, (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Cynthia Hawkins DeBose, Book Review, David Carney (Ed.), To Promote the General Welfare: A Communitarian Legal Reader, 10 Law & Pol'y Book Reviews 383 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Mark D. Bauer (ed.), CCH State Unfair Trade Practices (CCH, 2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Date of Publication:
Tim Kaye, Review of John Ford et al., Education Law and Practice, 19 Civ. Just. Q. 204 (2000)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.