Supreme Court News Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Louis J. Virelli and Richard W. Murphy, Supreme Court News, 49 Administrative & Regulatory Law News 22 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
2024
Article III and Indian Tribes Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Grant Christensen, Article III and Indian Tribes, 108 Minn. L. Rev. 1789 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Among the most basic principles of our federal courts is that they are courts of limited jurisdiction, exercising only those powers delegated to them in Article III. In 1985 the Supreme Court inexplicably created an exception to this constitutional tenant, and unilaterally declared a plenary judicial power to review the exercise of an Indian tribe’s inherent sovereign authority. This exception is unmoored from all other Supreme Court precedent outside Indian law, and unjustifiably assumes the judicial power in direct contrast to the Court’s ordinarily thoughtful jurisprudence on Article III and deference to the separation of powers.
This article concludes that the Supreme Court was wrong in 1985 when it assumed a plenary judicial power over Indian affairs. The consequences are profound, and suggest a reconceptualization of the entire field of Indian law. Canon creating cases like Oliphant, Montana, and Cabazon should never have been decided because the exercise of a tribe’s inherent authority does not create a federal question conferring subject matter jurisdiction on the federal courts. The inherent power of Indian tribes to criminally prosecute or civilly regulate non-Indians in Indian country should not subject them to the judicially imposed limits set by the Supreme Court, because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to decide those cases. Until a treaty or statute creates an affirmative basis for federal court review, an Indian tribe’s inherent powers are subject to the checks and balances imposed by tribal government and no others.
Between a Rock and a Hardened Place: Prioritizing Climate Resiliency for Vulnerable Biodiversity Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Jaclyn Lopez, Between a Rock and a Hardened Place: Prioritizing Climate Resiliency for Vulnerable Biodiversity, 34 Duke Envtl. L. & Policy Forum 157 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The (In)direct Effects of 20 Years of Public Citizen Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Jaclyn Lopez, The (In)direct Effects of 20 Years of Public Citizen, 15 George Washington Journal of Energy and Envtl. L. 21 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The federal circuits have diverging trends in their treatment of Department of Transportation v. Public Citizen, the 2004 landmark Supreme Court decision that held that federal agencies do not always need to analyze and disclose the indirect effects of their actions. Explanations for this phenomenon include that courts may be following more universal conservative and progressive trends in their circuits, or perhaps that distinctions turn on the statutes at play, or that particular courts may be more inclined to defer to an agency's interpretation of its regulations rather than Congress' intent in passing a particular law. This Article provides a critical review of the last 20 years of case law and regulatory changes regarding the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") and what types of environmental effects federal agencies must disclose and analyze in funding or authorizing major federal actions following Public Citizen.
Federal courts since that decision have navigated precedent seemingly at odds with Congress' intent that federal agencies use all practicable means to "assure for all Americans safe, healthful, productive, and esthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings" in considering all reasonably foreseeable effects of major actions. Some courts maintain that federal agencies must analyze and disclose the reasonably foreseeable
indirect effects of the actions they authorize, while others have adopted a broader interpretation of Public Citizen to virtually eliminate indirect effects analysis regardless of foreseeability if there is a break in the causal chain or lack of discretion to address the impacts. This Article helps illuminate why these trends may have emerged, aids litigators in navigating the legal landscape, and provides fodder for NEPA reform. It concludes with recommendations for practitioners who seek to protect the human environment through the enforcement of NEPA's requirement that agencies analyze and disclose a complete account of the reasonably foreseeable effects of their actions.
Law, Migration, and the Construction of Whiteness: Mobility within the European Union Book
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Dagmar Myslinska, Law, Migration, and the Construction of Whiteness: Mobility within the European Union (Routledge, 2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Library Spaces as Wellness Spaces Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Kristen R. Moore and Angelina M. Vigliotti, Library Spaces as Wellness Spaces, 28 AALL Spectrum 36 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Family Caregivers’ Attitudes and Perspectives about the Sexual Reproductive Health of Women with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: An Online Survey Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Robyn Powell et al., Family Caregivers’ Attitudes and Perspectives about the Sexual Reproductive Health of Women with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: An Online Survey, 129 American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 135 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
Although sexual and reproductive health is critically important for women with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD), there is limited research elucidating the role of family caregivers in assisting women with IDD access sexual and reproductive health services and information. Understanding the family caregivers' attitudes and perspectives is essential to improving access to sexual and reproductive health services and information for women with IDD. A cross-sectional online survey of family caregivers of women with IDD was administered between June and October 2018. Quantitative analysis was conducted for closed-ended responses, and qualitative analysis was conducted for open-ended responses. The analytic sample included 132 family caregivers. Most participants were parents and reported being closely involved in their family member's access to sexual and reproductive health services and information. Although most participants expressed that sexual and reproductive health services and information are essential for women with IDD, qualitative analysis of participants' open-ended responses revealed both supportive and restrictive attitudes and perspectives on sexual and reproductive health services and information for women with IDD. Supportive attitudes and perspectives included (1) "knowledge is power;" (2) supported decision-making; and (3) protection against sexual abuse. Restrictive attitudes and perspectives included (1) dependent on the individual; (2) lack of autonomy; and (3) placing responsibility on disability. Greater attention from policymakers and practitioners to systems-level changes, including universal and accessible sexual education for women with IDD, supported decision-making, and sexual abuse prevention measures, are urgently needed.
Keeping Current – Property Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Darryl Wilson and Shelby D. Green, Keeping Current – Property, 38 Probate and Property 20 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
The Stakes of the Supreme Court’s Pro-Corruption Rulings in the Age of Trump: Why the Supreme Court Should Have Taken Judicial Notice of the Post-January 6 Reality in Percoco Article
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, The Stakes of the Supreme Court’s Pro-Corruption Rulings in the Age of Trump: Why the Supreme Court Should Have Taken Judicial Notice of the Post-January 6 Reality in Percoco, 133 Yale L.J. Forum 656 (2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.
In Percoco, the Supreme Court squandered opportunities to contextualize political corruption. This piece argues that the Supreme Court should have taken judicial notice of the Post-January 6th circumstances which surround the decision. This is a perilous time in American democracy for the Justices to make prosecuting corrupt campaign managers arduous.
Property Law Book
Date of Publication:
Recommended Citation
D. Benjamin Barros et al., Property Law (3rd ed., Aspen Publishing, 2024)Clicking on the button will copy the full recommended citation.